IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pgph00/0003851.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Understanding the expectations, positions and ambitions of LMICs during pandemic treaty negotiations, and the factors contributing to them

Author

Listed:
  • Greta Cranston

Abstract

Global South countries account for two-thirds of WHO Member States and are a crucial voice in negotiating the ‘pandemic treaty’, which Member States agreed was necessary if the world was to avoid a repeat of the significant inequity that resulted during COVID-19. The negotiation of a pandemic treaty presents an opportunity to recalibrate global health systems and processes for pandemic prevention, preparedness and response. However, for this to eventuate through global solidarity, as many Global South countries have said they expect, then concessions by developed states on issues that they have long protected must occur. It remains to be seen whether the negotiations amount to a rebalancing of power and resources to substantially improve our capacity and capability to address global health threats. Further, while these issues have often been viewed through a dualistic lens between developing and developed countries, these negotiations also reflect the diversity of Global South Member States, some of which are strong voices in, and for, coalitions. Drawing on content analysis techniques, this research describes how Global South countries articulate their expectations, positions and ambitions during treaty negotiations in the lead up to the World Health Assembly in 2024 and discusses exogenous and endogenous factors that contribute to these positions. The analysis found that the pursuit of equity is galvanising for Global South countries, as are their ambitions for the multilateral system not to drive further inequity through the asymmetry of power and influence exercised by developed states. Well-coordinated collective positions from Global South countries in negotiations to date have resulted in traction on contested issues such as technology transfer, production capability, and access and benefits. Additionally, some Global South countries have also used these negotiations to pursue national interests whilst maintaining collective positions in pursuit of equity and global solidarity.

Suggested Citation

  • Greta Cranston, 2025. "Understanding the expectations, positions and ambitions of LMICs during pandemic treaty negotiations, and the factors contributing to them," PLOS Global Public Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(3), pages 1-20, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0003851
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0003851
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0003851
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0003851&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pgph.0003851?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0003851. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: globalpubhealth (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.