IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pgph00/0003557.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Examining national health insurance fund members’ preferences and trade-offs for the attributes of contracted outpatient facilities in Kenya: A discrete choice experiment

Author

Listed:
  • Jacob Kazungu
  • Edwine Barasa
  • Justice Nonvignon
  • Matthew Quaife

Abstract

Patient choice of health facilities is increasingly gaining recognition for potentially enhancing the attainment of health system goals globally. In Kenya, National Health Insurance Fund (NHIF) members are required to choose an NHIF-contracted outpatient facility before accessing care. Understanding their preferences could support resource allocation decisions, enhance the provision of patient-centered care, and deepen NHIF’s purchasing decisions. We employed a discrete choice experiment to examine NHIF members’ preferences for attributes of NHIF-contracted outpatient facilities in Kenya. We developed a d-efficient experimental design with six attributes, namely availability of drugs, distance from household to facility, waiting time at the facility until consultation, cleanliness of the facility, attitude of health worker, and cadre of health workers seen during consultation. Data were then collected from 402 NHIF members in six out of 47 counties. Choice data were analysed using panel mixed multinomial logit and latent class models. NHIF members preferred NHIF-contracted outpatient facilities that always had drugs [β=1.572], were closer to their households [β=-0.082], had shorter waiting times [β=-0.195], had respectful staff [β=1.249] and had either clinical officers [β=0.478] or medical doctors [β=1.525] for consultation. NHIF members indicated a willingness to accept travel 17.8km if drugs were always available, 17.7km to see a medical doctor for consultation, and 14.6km to see respectful health workers. Furthermore, NHIF members indicated a willingness to wait at a facility for 8.9 hours to ensure the availability of drugs, 8.8 hours to see a doctor for consultation, and 7.2 hours to see respectful health workers. Understanding NHIF member preferences and trade-offs can inform resource allocation at counties, service provision across providers, and purchasing decisions of purchasers such as the recently formed social health insurance authority in Kenya as a move towards UHC.

Suggested Citation

  • Jacob Kazungu & Edwine Barasa & Justice Nonvignon & Matthew Quaife, 2025. "Examining national health insurance fund members’ preferences and trade-offs for the attributes of contracted outpatient facilities in Kenya: A discrete choice experiment," PLOS Global Public Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(4), pages 1-19, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0003557
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0003557
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0003557
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0003557&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pgph.0003557?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0003557. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: globalpubhealth (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.