Author
Listed:
- Hossam Ali-Hassan
- Shauna Clayton
- Safoura Zangiabadi
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic prompted adaptations to the delivery of healthcare services across Canada. In response to associated health risks and physical distancing protocols, some physicians adopted telemedicine procedures into their practice where possible. The present study aimed to investigate the impact that mode of healthcare delivery had on physicians’ intention to quit their jobs due to stress, burnout, or mental health. The study utilized data collected by Statistics Canada from the Health Care Workers’ Experience (SHCWEP) survey during the COVID-19 pandemic. The sample included 2,198 participants, weighted to represent 93,952 Canadian physicians aged 18 and above. Modes of healthcare delivery were categorized as either in-person, online, or blended. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to examine the relationship between mode of healthcare delivery and intention to quit due to stress, burnout, or mental health, after adjusting for sociodemographic, job-, and health-related factors. Intention to quit within the next two years due to stress, burnout, or mental health was reported by 7.5% of physicians. Compared to the in-person modality, online or blended healthcare delivery was associated with decreased the odds of intention to quit (OR = 0.67, 95% CI: 0.63–0.72 and OR = 0.66, 95% CI: 0.58–0.75, respectively). The present study sheds light on factors associated with medical frontline worker well-being and retention, factors which can subsequently impact the quality of patient care. Future considerations regarding healthcare policy should incorporate strategies that protect and enhance physicians’ mental health into its framework to mitigate future risks.
Suggested Citation
Hossam Ali-Hassan & Shauna Clayton & Safoura Zangiabadi, 2024.
"Effect of mode of healthcare delivery on stress and intention to quit among physicians in Canada during the COVID-19 pandemic,"
PLOS Global Public Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(7), pages 1-10, July.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pgph00:0003377
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0003377
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0003377. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: globalpubhealth (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.