IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pgph00/0003244.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Generating opposition to universal health care policies in the United States: An analysis of private health industry advertising on Meta platforms

Author

Listed:
  • Kendra Chow
  • Marco Zenone
  • Nora Kenworthy
  • Beza Merid
  • Nason Maani

Abstract

In 2019, the Partnership for America’s Health Care Future (PAHCF), a private health industry lobby group, launched a campaign across Meta platforms (Facebook, Instagram) to generate opposition to universal health care policies in the United States. This study investigates the content and themes prevalent in PAHCF’s campaign and how these might shape public discourse and perceptions around universal health care policies. Using qualitative content analysis, 1675 advertisements were examined on Meta platforms within PAHCF’s campaign. Inductive methodology was applied to develop a coding framework. Details of campaign spend and number of impressions advertisements received were also collected. The qualitative coding strategies identified three overarching campaign foci: policy targets, claims and themes, and targeted appeal groups. These elements were found to strategically and mutually reinforce one another to generate the narrative that proposed universal health care policies will be detrimental to public health, the economy, and society. Analysis identified that PAHCF engages in strategies common among unhealthy commodity industries. Social media in this instance powerfully perpetuated PAHCF messages that undermined universal health care efforts and contributed to the commercial determinants of health impacts of this industry. These findings indicate that the private health care industry is participating in wider commercial determinants of health activities, acting to protect their profits to the detriment of public health. Like other campaigns by unhealthy commodity industries, PAHCF’s campaign is designed to increase doubt in the benefits of health policies, undermine public trust in government and evidence, and promote public alignment with their own messaging and preferred solutions. To counter such tactics, public health professionals need to gain a better understanding of the strategies unhealthy commodity industries utilize to deflect attention from their underlying health-harming intentions, especially through more novel platforms like social media.

Suggested Citation

  • Kendra Chow & Marco Zenone & Nora Kenworthy & Beza Merid & Nason Maani, 2025. "Generating opposition to universal health care policies in the United States: An analysis of private health industry advertising on Meta platforms," PLOS Global Public Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(7), pages 1-21, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0003244
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0003244
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0003244
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0003244&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pgph.0003244?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0003244. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: globalpubhealth (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.