IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pgph00/0003181.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modeling the economic burden of postpartum hemorrhage due to substandard uterotonics in Ghana

Author

Listed:
  • Kiara Bautista
  • Yi-Fang (Ashley) Lee
  • Colleen R Higgins
  • Petra Procter
  • Sara Rushwan
  • Abraham Baidoo
  • Kofi Issah
  • Chris Opoku Fofie
  • A Metin Gülmezoglu
  • Lester Chinery
  • Sachiko Ozawa

Abstract

Uterotonics are essential in preventing postpartum hemorrhage (PPH), the leading direct cause of maternal death worldwide. However, uterotonics are often substandard in low- and middle-income countries, contributing to poor maternal health outcomes. This study examines the health and economic impact of substandard uterotonics in Ghana. A decision-tree model was built to simulate vaginal and cesarean section births across health facilities, uterotonic quality and utilization, PPH risk and diagnosis, and resulting health and economic outcomes. We utilized delivery data from Ghana’s maternal health survey, risks of health outcomes from a Cochrane review, and E-MOTIVE trial data for health outcomes related to oxytocin quality. We compared scenarios with and without substandard uterotonics, as well as scenarios altering uterotonic use and care-seeking behaviors. We found that substandard uterotonic use contributes to $18.8 million in economic burden annually, including $6.3 million and $4.8 million in out-of-pocket expenditures in public and private sectors, respectively. Annually, the National Health Insurance Scheme bears $1.6 million in costs due to substandard uterotonic use. Substandard uterotonics contribute to $6 million in long-term productivity losses from maternal mortality annually. Improving the quality of uterotonics could reduce 20,000 (11%) PPH cases, 5,000 (11%) severe PPH cases, and 100 (11%) deaths due to PPH annually in Ghana. Ensuring the quality of uterotonics would result in millions of dollars in cost savings and improve maternal health outcomes for the government and families in Ghana. Cost savings from improving uterotonic quality would provide financial protection and help Ghana advance toward Universal Health Coverage.

Suggested Citation

  • Kiara Bautista & Yi-Fang (Ashley) Lee & Colleen R Higgins & Petra Procter & Sara Rushwan & Abraham Baidoo & Kofi Issah & Chris Opoku Fofie & A Metin Gülmezoglu & Lester Chinery & Sachiko Ozawa, 2024. "Modeling the economic burden of postpartum hemorrhage due to substandard uterotonics in Ghana," PLOS Global Public Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(6), pages 1-18, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0003181
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0003181
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0003181
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0003181&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pgph.0003181?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sachiko Ozawa & Colleen R Higgins & Tatenda T Yemeke & Jude I Nwokike & Lawrence Evans & Mustapha Hajjou & Victor S Pribluda, 2020. "Importance of medicine quality in achieving universal health coverage," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(7), pages 1-15, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0003181. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: globalpubhealth (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.