IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pgph00/0002979.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Beyond the Ivory Tower: Perception of academic global surgery by surgeons in low- and middle-income countries

Author

Listed:
  • Arinzechukwu Nwagbata
  • Rohini Dutta
  • Anusha Jayaram
  • Neil Thivalapill
  • Samarvir Jain
  • Isabella Faria
  • Isaac G Alty
  • Anita Gadgil
  • Nobhojit Roy
  • Nakul P Raykar
  • Global Surgery Survey Team

Abstract

Interest in global surgery has surged amongst academics and practitioners in high-income countries (HICs), but it is unclear how frontline surgical practitioners in low-resource environments perceive the new field or its benefit. Our objective was to assess perceptions of academic global surgery amongst surgeons in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). We conducted a cross-sectional e-survey among surgical trainees and consultants in 62 LMICs, as defined by the World Bank in 2020. This paper is a sub-analysis highlighting the perception of academic surgery and the association between practice setting and responses using Pearson’s Chi-square test. Analyses were completed using Stata15. The survey received 416 responses, including 173 consultants (41.6%), 221 residents (53.1%), 8 medical graduates (1.9%), and 14 fellows (3.4%). Of these, 72 responses (17.3%) were from low-income countries, 137 (32.9%) from lower-middle-income countries, and 207 (49.8%) from upper-middle-income countries. 286 respondents (68.8%) practiced in urban areas, 34 (8.2%) in rural areas, and 84 (20.2%) in both rural and urban areas. Only 185 (44.58%) were familiar with the term “global surgery.” However, 326 (79.3%) agreed that collaborating with HIC surgeons for research is beneficial to being a global surgeon, 323 (78.8%) agreed that having an HIC co-author improves likelihood of publication in a reputable journal, 337 (81.6%) agreed that securing research funding is difficult in their country, 195 (47.3%) agreed that their institutions consider research for promotion, 252 (61.0%) agreed that they can combine research and clinical practice, and 336 (82%) are willing to train HIC medical students and residents. A majority of these LMIC surgeons noted limited academic incentives to perform research in the field. The academic global surgery community should take note and foster equitable collaborations to ensure that this critical segment of stakeholders is engaged and has fewer barriers to participation.

Suggested Citation

  • Arinzechukwu Nwagbata & Rohini Dutta & Anusha Jayaram & Neil Thivalapill & Samarvir Jain & Isabella Faria & Isaac G Alty & Anita Gadgil & Nobhojit Roy & Nakul P Raykar & Global Surgery Survey Team, 2024. "Beyond the Ivory Tower: Perception of academic global surgery by surgeons in low- and middle-income countries," PLOS Global Public Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(3), pages 1-11, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0002979
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0002979
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0002979
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0002979&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pgph.0002979?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nchangwi Syntia Munung & Bongani M Mayosi & Jantina de Vries, 2017. "Equity in international health research collaborations in Africa: Perceptions and expectations of African researchers," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(10), pages 1-17, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Elizabeth S. Vieira, 2024. "Research collaboration and knowledge development in Africa: the case of neonatal conditions," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 129(4), pages 2407-2431, April.
    2. Elizabeth S. Vieira, 2022. "International research collaboration in Africa: a bibliometric and thematic analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(5), pages 2747-2772, May.
    3. Daniel Z Hodson & Yannick Mbarga Etoundi & Sunil Parikh & Yap Boum II, 2023. "Striving towards true equity in global health: A checklist for bilateral research partnerships," PLOS Global Public Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 3(1), pages 1-15, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0002979. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: globalpubhealth (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.