IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pgph00/0002902.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A scoping review of the residual barriers to skilled birth attendance in Ghana: A conceptual framework and a fish bone analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Juliet Abredu
  • Catherine K Dwumfour
  • Boo Alipitio
  • Mawusi Alordey
  • Veronica Millicent Dzomeku
  • Sophie Witter

Abstract

The achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) targets 3.1, 3.2 and 3.3.1 is strongly dependent on the effective utilization of skilled birth services. Despite advancements made in Skilled Birth Attendance (SBA) in Ghana, there are still instances of unassisted childbirths taking place. The aim of this study was to explore the residual barriers of SBA such as community- and health system-related factors affecting SBA in Ghana and to identify strategies for addressing them. An electronic search was done using PubMed, Popline, Science direct, BioMed Central, Scopus and Google scholar for peer reviewed articles as well as grey articles from other relevant sources, published between 200 and 2022 on community- and health system related factors influencing SBA in Ghana. Out of the 89 articles retrieved for full screening, a total of 52 peer-reviewed articles and 1 grey article were selected for the final review. The study revealed that cultural practices (community factors), low quality of service delivery due to the inappropriate behaviors, lack of competency of skilled birth attendants (SBAs) as well as the inefficient distribution of SBAs contribute to ineffective uptake of SBA (health system factors). Also, indirect costs are associated with the utilization of skilled delivery care even with the existence of ‘free’ delivery care policy under the national health insurance (policy factor). For Ghana to achieve the SDGs above and improve SBA, it is essential to enhance the quality of skilled delivery care by addressing the attitude and competencies of skilled birth professionals, while plans are put in place to expand and develop the Community-based Health Planning and Services (CHPS) strategy to help address the access barriers to SBA. More so, the ‘free’ delivery care policy should absorb all the costs associated with skilled delivery for pregnant women as it is intended for.

Suggested Citation

  • Juliet Abredu & Catherine K Dwumfour & Boo Alipitio & Mawusi Alordey & Veronica Millicent Dzomeku & Sophie Witter, 2024. "A scoping review of the residual barriers to skilled birth attendance in Ghana: A conceptual framework and a fish bone analysis," PLOS Global Public Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(2), pages 1-17, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0002902
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0002902
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0002902
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0002902&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pgph.0002902?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vincent Bio Bediako & Ebenezer N K Boateng & Bernard Afriyie Owusu & Kwamena Sekyi Dickson, 2021. "Multilevel geospatial analysis of factors associated with unskilled birth attendance in Ghana," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(6), pages 1-20, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0002902. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: globalpubhealth (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.