IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pgph00/0002741.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does mHealth influence community health worker performance in vulnerable populations? A mixed methods study in a multinational refugee settlement in Uganda

Author

Listed:
  • Michael T Wagaba
  • David Musoke
  • Arthur Bagonza
  • John B Ddamulira
  • Christine K Nalwadda
  • Christopher G Orach

Abstract

Community Health Workers (CHWs) provide healthcare in under-served communities, including refugee settlements, despite various challenges hindering their performance. Implementers have adopted mobile wireless technologies (m-Health) to improve the performance of CHWs in refugee settlements. We assessed the CHWs’ performance and associated factors in a multi-national refugee settlement, operating mHealth and paper-based methods. This cross-sectional study employed quantitative and qualitative data collection methods. Data for 300 CHWs was collected from implementing partners’ (IPs) databases. Nine focus group discussions (FGDs) with the CHWs and community members, two in-depth interviews (IDIs) with CHW leaders, and eight key informant interviews (KIIs) with six IPs and two local leaders were conducted. The qualitative data were analysed thematically using AtlasTi version 9 while the quantitative data were analysed at the univariate, bivariate and multivariable levels using Stata version14. The study found that only 17% of the CHWs performed optimally. The factors that significantly influenced CHW performance included education level: secondary and above (APR: 1.83, 95% CI: 1.02–3.30), having a side occupation (APR: 2.02, 95% CI: 1.16–3.52) and mHealth use (APR: 0.06, 95% CI: 0.02-.0.30). The qualitative data suggested that performance was influenced by the number of households assigned to CHWs, monetary incentives, adequacy of materials and facilitation. Particularly, mHealth was preferred to paper-based methods. Overall, the CHWs’ performance was sub-optimal; only 2 in 10 performed satisfactorily. The main factors that influenced performance included the level of education, use of mHealth, having another occupation, workload and incentivisation. CHWs and IPs preferred mHealth to paper-based methods. IPs should work to improve refugee settlement working conditions for the CHWs and adopt mHealth to improve CHW performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael T Wagaba & David Musoke & Arthur Bagonza & John B Ddamulira & Christine K Nalwadda & Christopher G Orach, 2023. "Does mHealth influence community health worker performance in vulnerable populations? A mixed methods study in a multinational refugee settlement in Uganda," PLOS Global Public Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 3(12), pages 1-18, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0002741
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0002741
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0002741
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0002741&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pgph.0002741?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0002741. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: globalpubhealth (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.