IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pgph00/0002661.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Advancing equitable access to digital mental health in the Asia-Pacific region in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond: A modified Delphi consensus study

Author

Listed:
  • Jill K Murphy
  • Shirley Saker
  • Promit Ananyo Chakraborty
  • Yuen Mei (Michelle) Chan
  • Erin E Michalak
  • Matias Irrarazaval
  • Mellissa Withers
  • Chee H Ng
  • Amna Khan
  • Andrew Greenshaw
  • John O’Neil
  • Vu Cong Nguyen
  • Harry Minas
  • Arun Ravindran
  • Angela Paric
  • Jun Chen
  • Xing Wang
  • Tae-Yeon Hwang
  • Nurashikin Ibrahim
  • Simon Hatcher
  • Vanessa Evans
  • Raymond W Lam

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic had an unprecedented impact on global mental health and well-being, including across the Asia-Pacific. Efforts to mitigate virus spread led to far-reaching disruption in the delivery of health and social services. In response, there was a rapid shift to the use of digital mental health (DMH) approaches. Though these technologies helped to improve access to care for many, there was also substantial risk of access barriers leading to increased inequities in access to mental health care, particularly among at-risk and equity-deserving populations. The objective of this study was to conduct a needs assessment and identify priorities related to equitable DMH access among at-risk and equity-deserving populations in the Asia Pacific region during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic. The study consisted of a modified Delphi consensus methodology including two rounds of online surveys and online consultations with stakeholders from across the region. Study participants included policy makers, clinicians and service providers, and people with lived experience of mental health conditions. Results demonstrate that vulnerabilities to negative mental health impacts and access barriers were compounded during the pandemic. Access barriers included a lack of linguistically and culturally appropriate DMH options, low mental health literacy and poor access to technological infrastructure and devices, low levels of awareness and trust of DMH options, and lack of policies and guidelines to support effective and equitable delivery of DMH. Recommendations to improve equitable access include ensuring that diverse people with lived experience are engaged in research, co-design and policy development, the development and implementation of evidence-based and equity-informed guidelines and frameworks, clear communication about DMH evidence and availability, and the integration of DMH into broader health systems. Study results can inform the development and implementation of equitable DMH as its use becomes more widespread across health systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Jill K Murphy & Shirley Saker & Promit Ananyo Chakraborty & Yuen Mei (Michelle) Chan & Erin E Michalak & Matias Irrarazaval & Mellissa Withers & Chee H Ng & Amna Khan & Andrew Greenshaw & John O’Neil , 2024. "Advancing equitable access to digital mental health in the Asia-Pacific region in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond: A modified Delphi consensus study," PLOS Global Public Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(6), pages 1-30, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0002661
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0002661
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0002661
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0002661&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pgph.0002661?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0002661. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: globalpubhealth (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.