Author
Listed:
- Kaniz Fatima
- Shimlin Jahan Khanam
- Md Mostafizur Rahman
- Md Iqbal Kabir
- Md Nuruzzaman Khan
Abstract
Around half of births in Bangladesh occur at home without skilled birth personnel. This study aims to identify the geographical hot spots and cold spots of home delivery in Bangladesh and associated factors. We analyzed data from the 2017/2018 Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey and the 2017 Bangladesh Health Facility Survey. The outcome variable was home delivery without skilled personnel supervision (yes, no). Explanatory variables included individual, household, community, and healthcare facility level factors. Moran’s I was used to determine hot spots (geographic locations with notably high rates of home delivery) and cold spots (geographic areas exhibiting significantly low rates of home delivery) of home delivery. Geographically weighted regression models were used to identify cluster-specific predictors of home delivery. The prevalence of without skilled personnel supervised home delivery was 53.18%. Hot spots of non-supervised and unskilled supervised home delivery were primarily located in Dhaka, Khulna, Rajshahi, and Rangpur divisions. Cold spots of home delivery were mainly located in Mymensingh and Sylhet divisions. Predictors of higher home births in hot spot areas included women’s illiteracy, lack of formal job engagement, higher number of children ever born, partner’s agriculture occupation, higher community-level illiteracy, and larger distance to the nearest healthcare facility from women’s homes. The study findings suggest home delivery is prevalent in Bangladesh. Awareness-building programs should emphasize the importance of skilled and supervised institutional deliveries, particularly among the poor and disadvantaged groups.
Suggested Citation
Kaniz Fatima & Shimlin Jahan Khanam & Md Mostafizur Rahman & Md Iqbal Kabir & Md Nuruzzaman Khan, 2024.
"Clustering of home delivery in Bangladesh and its predictors: Evidence from the linked household and health facility level survey data,"
PLOS Global Public Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(2), pages 1-13, February.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pgph00:0002607
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0002607
Download full text from publisher
References listed on IDEAS
- repec:plo:pone00:0219860 is not listed on IDEAS
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0002607. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: globalpubhealth (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.