IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pgph00/0002252.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A new tool for evaluating health equity in academic journals; the Diversity Factor

Author

Listed:
  • Jack Gallifant
  • Joe Zhang
  • Stephen Whebell
  • Justin Quion
  • Braiam Escobar
  • Judy Gichoya
  • Karen Herrera
  • Ruxana Jina
  • Swathikan Chidambaram
  • Abha Mehndiratta
  • Richard Kimera
  • Alvin Marcelo
  • Portia Grace Fernandez-Marcelo
  • Juan Sebastian Osorio
  • Cleva Villanueva
  • Lama Nazer
  • Irene Dankwa-Mullan
  • Leo Anthony Celi

Abstract

Current methods to evaluate a journal’s impact rely on the downstream citation mapping used to generate the Impact Factor. This approach is a fragile metric prone to being skewed by outlier values and does not speak to a researcher’s contribution to furthering health outcomes for all populations. Therefore, we propose the implementation of a Diversity Factor to fulfill this need and supplement the current metrics. It is composed of four key elements: dataset properties, author country, author gender and departmental affiliation. Due to the significance of each individual element, they should be assessed independently of each other as opposed to being combined into a simplified score to be optimized. Herein, we discuss the necessity of such metrics, provide a framework to build upon, evaluate the current landscape through the lens of each key element and publish the findings on a freely available website that enables further evaluation. The OpenAlex database was used to extract the metadata of all papers published from 2000 until August 2022, and Natural language processing was used to identify individual elements. Features were then displayed individually on a static dashboard developed using TableauPublic, which is available at www.equitablescience.com. In total, 130,721 papers were identified from 7,462 journals where significant underrepresentation of LMIC and Female authors was demonstrated. These findings are pervasive and show no positive correlation with the Journal’s Impact Factor. The systematic collection of the Diversity Factor concept would allow for more detailed analysis, highlight gaps in knowledge, and reflect confidence in the translation of related research. Conversion of this metric to an active pipeline would account for the fact that how we define those most at risk will change over time and quantify responses to particular initiatives. Therefore, continuous measurement of outcomes across groups and those investigating those outcomes will never lose importance. Moving forward, we encourage further revision and improvement by diverse author groups in order to better refine this concept.

Suggested Citation

  • Jack Gallifant & Joe Zhang & Stephen Whebell & Justin Quion & Braiam Escobar & Judy Gichoya & Karen Herrera & Ruxana Jina & Swathikan Chidambaram & Abha Mehndiratta & Richard Kimera & Alvin Marcelo & , 2023. "A new tool for evaluating health equity in academic journals; the Diversity Factor," PLOS Global Public Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 3(8), pages 1-11, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0002252
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0002252
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0002252
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0002252&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pgph.0002252?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0002252. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: globalpubhealth (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.