IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pgph00/0001805.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Post-operative outcomes in Indigenous patients in North America and Oceania: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Rachel J Livergant
  • Kelsey Stefanyk
  • Catherine Binda
  • Georgia Fraulin
  • Sasha Maleki
  • Sarah Sibbeston
  • Shahrzad Joharifard
  • Tracey Hillier
  • Emilie Joos

Abstract

Indigenous Peoples across North America and Oceania experience worse health outcomes compared to non-Indigenous people, including increased post-operative mortality. Several gaps in data exist regarding global differences in surgical morbidity and mortality for Indigenous populations based on geographic locations and across surgical specialties. The aim of this study is to evaluate disparities in post-operative outcomes between Indigenous and non-Indigenous populations. This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted in accordance with PRISMA and MOOSE guidelines. Eight electronic databases were searched with no language restriction. Studies reporting on Indigenous populations outside of Canada, the USA, New Zealand, or Australia, or on interventional procedures were excluded. Primary outcomes were post-operative morbidity and mortality. Secondary outcomes included reoperations, readmission rates, and length of hospital stay. The Newcastle Ottawa Scale was used for quality assessment. Eighty-four unique observational studies were included in this review. Of these, 67 studies were included in the meta-analysis (Oceania n = 31, North America n = 36). Extensive heterogeneity existed among studies and 50% were of poor quality. Indigenous patients had 1.26 times odds of post-operative morbidity (OR = 1.26, 95% CI: 1.10–1.44, p

Suggested Citation

  • Rachel J Livergant & Kelsey Stefanyk & Catherine Binda & Georgia Fraulin & Sasha Maleki & Sarah Sibbeston & Shahrzad Joharifard & Tracey Hillier & Emilie Joos, 2023. "Post-operative outcomes in Indigenous patients in North America and Oceania: A systematic review and meta-analysis," PLOS Global Public Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 3(8), pages 1-18, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0001805
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001805
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0001805
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0001805&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pgph.0001805?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0001805. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: globalpubhealth (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.