IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pgph00/0001651.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Best practices in the African Medicines Regulatory Harmonization initiative: Perspectives of regulators and medicines manufacturers

Author

Listed:
  • Margareth Ndomondo-Sigonda
  • Samvel Azatyan
  • Petra Doerr
  • Collins Agaba
  • Kristin N Harper

Abstract

In the African Medicines Regulatory Harmonization initiative, national regulatory authorities (NRAs) within each of Africa’s regional economic communities coordinate their activities, rely on the work of one another and other trusted regulatory authorities, and apply other principles of smart regulation. The first regional medicines regulatory harmonization (MRH) initiative in Africa was launched in 2012, with the goal of accelerating access to quality, safe, effective medical products, and now five MRH initiatives are active on the continent. Thus, a wealth of knowledge regarding best practices and approaches to dealing with common challenges has accumulated. The goal of this qualitative study was to gather and share information on these best practices. To do this, we conducted interviews with key participants from four regional MRH initiatives—the East African Community (EAC), Southern African Development Community (SADC), Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS), and Intergovernmental Authority on Development (IGAD)—as well as representatives from the pharmaceutical industry. Here we explore major themes that emerged from the interviews: 1. Transparency and reliability are critical; 2. Reliance is essential for smart regulation; 3. Multiple successful strategies for NRA capacity building have been identified; 4. Communication between heads of agencies is essential; 5. Cooperation at the regional level is not possible without leadership at the NRA level; 6. Sustainable funding remains challenging; and 7. Industry has important insights. We hope that the information on best practices shared in this article can benefit regional MRH initiatives inside and outside of Africa, ultimately helping them accelerate access to quality, safe, effective medical products.

Suggested Citation

  • Margareth Ndomondo-Sigonda & Samvel Azatyan & Petra Doerr & Collins Agaba & Kristin N Harper, 2023. "Best practices in the African Medicines Regulatory Harmonization initiative: Perspectives of regulators and medicines manufacturers," PLOS Global Public Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 3(4), pages 1-20, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0001651
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001651
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0001651
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0001651&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pgph.0001651?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vincent Ahonkhai & Samuel F Martins & Alexandre Portet & Murray Lumpkin & Dan Hartman, 2016. "Speeding Access to Vaccines and Medicines in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Case for Change and a Framework for Optimized Product Market Authorization," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(11), pages 1-12, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Padmashree Gehl Sampath, 2022. "Strade Measures On Pharmaceutical Products: Can They Promote Local Production And Public Health?," Asia-Pacific Sustainable Development Journal, United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP), vol. 29(2), pages 47-69, November.
    2. Steven G Morgan & Brandon Yau & Murray M Lumpkin, 2017. "The cost of entry: An analysis of pharmaceutical registration fees in low-, middle-, and high-income countries," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(8), pages 1-10, August.
    3. Nilubon Subsittipong & Junjeong Choi & Tae Hyun Kim & Euna Han, 2022. "Delay in Vaccine Access in ASEAN Countries," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-13, March.
    4. Ria Christine Siagian & Dumilah Ayuningtyas, 2019. "Gap analysis for drug development policy-making: An attempt to close the gap between policy and its implementation," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(8), pages 1-13, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0001651. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: globalpubhealth (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.