IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pgph00/0001467.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

National health policies and strategies for addressing chronic kidney disease: Data from the International Society of Nephrology Global Kidney Health Atlas

Author

Listed:
  • Brendon L Neuen
  • Aminu K Bello
  • Adeera Levin
  • Meaghan Lunney
  • Mohamed A Osman
  • Feng Ye
  • Gloria E Ashuntantang
  • Ezequiel Bellorin-Font
  • Mohammed Benghanem Gharbi
  • Sara Davison
  • Mohammad Ghnaimat
  • Paul Harden
  • Vivekanand Jha
  • Kamyar Kalantar-Zadeh
  • Peter G Kerr
  • Scott Klarenbach
  • Csaba P Kovesdy
  • Valerie Luyckx
  • Shahrzad Ossareh
  • Jeffrey Perl
  • Harun Ur Rashid
  • Eric Rondeau
  • Emily J See
  • Syed Saad
  • Laura Sola
  • Irma Tchokhonelidze
  • Vladimir Tesar
  • Kriang Tungsanga
  • Rumeyza Turan Kazancioglu
  • Angela Yee-Moon Wang
  • Chih-Wei Yang
  • Alexander Zemchenkov
  • Ming-hui Zhao
  • Kitty J Jager
  • Fergus J Caskey
  • Vlado Perkovic
  • Kailash K Jindal
  • Ikechi G Okpechi
  • Marcello Tonelli
  • John Feehally
  • David C Harris
  • David W Johnson

Abstract

National strategies for addressing chronic kidney disease (CKD) are crucial to improving kidney health. We sought to describe country-level variations in non-communicable disease (NCD) strategies and CKD-specific policies across different regions and income levels worldwide. The International Society of Nephrology Global Kidney Health Atlas (GKHA) was a multinational cross-sectional survey conducted between July and October 2018. Responses from key opinion leaders in each country regarding national NCD strategies, the presence and scope of CKD-specific policies, and government recognition of CKD as a health priority were described overall and according to region and income level. 160 countries participated in the GKHA survey, comprising 97.8% of the world’s population. Seventy-four (47%) countries had an established national NCD strategy, and 53 (34%) countries reported the existence of CKD-specific policies, with substantial variation across regions and income levels. Where CKD-specific policies existed, non-dialysis CKD care was variably addressed. 79 (51%) countries identified government recognition of CKD as a health priority. Low- and low-middle income countries were less likely to have strategies and policies for addressing CKD and have governments which recognise it as a health priority. The existence of CKD-specific policies, and a national NCD strategy more broadly, varied substantially across different regions around the world but was overall suboptimal, with major discrepancies between the burden of CKD in many countries and governmental recognition of CKD as a health priority. Greater recognition of CKD within national health policy is critical to improving kidney healthcare globally.

Suggested Citation

  • Brendon L Neuen & Aminu K Bello & Adeera Levin & Meaghan Lunney & Mohamed A Osman & Feng Ye & Gloria E Ashuntantang & Ezequiel Bellorin-Font & Mohammed Benghanem Gharbi & Sara Davison & Mohammad Ghnai, 2023. "National health policies and strategies for addressing chronic kidney disease: Data from the International Society of Nephrology Global Kidney Health Atlas," PLOS Global Public Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 3(2), pages 1-13, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0001467
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001467
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0001467
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0001467&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pgph.0001467?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0001467. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: globalpubhealth (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.