IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pgph00/0000619.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence and risk factors among meat packing, produce processing, and farm workers

Author

Listed:
  • Melissa D Klein
  • Michael Sciaudone
  • David Richardson
  • Roberto Lacayo
  • Colleen M McClean
  • Oksana Kharabora
  • Katherine Murray
  • Miriana Moreno Zivanovich
  • Stephen Strohminger
  • Rachel Gurnett
  • Alena J Markmann
  • D Ryan Bhowmik
  • Emperatriz Morales Salgado
  • Edwin Castro-Arroyo
  • Allison E Aiello
  • Ross M Boyce
  • Jonathan J Juliano
  • Natalie M Bowman

Abstract

Meat packing, produce processing, and farm workers are known to have an elevated risk of COVID-19, but occupational risk factors in this population are unclear. We performed an observational cohort study of meat packing, produce processing, and farm workers in North Carolina in fall 2020. Blood, saliva, and nasal turbinate samples were collected to assess for SARS-CoV-2 seropositivity. Risk factors for SARS-CoV-2 seropositivity were investigated using chi-square tests, two-sample t-tests, and adjusted risk ratio analyses. Among 118 enrolled workers, the baseline SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence was 50.0%. Meat packing plant workers had the highest SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence (64.6%), followed by farm workers (45.0%) and produce processing workers (10.0%), despite similar sociodemographic characteristics. Compared to SARS-CoV-2 seronegative workers, seropositive workers were more likely to work in loud environments that necessitated yelling to communicate (RR: 1.83, 95% CI: 1.25–2.69), work in cold environments (RR: 1.58, 95% CI: 1.12–2.24), or continue working despite developing symptoms at work (RR: 1.63, 95% CI: 1.14–2.32). After adjusting for age and working despite symptoms, high occupational noise levels were associated with a 1.72 times higher risk of SARS-CoV-2 seropositivity (95% CI: 1.16–2.55). Half of food processing workers showed evidence of past SARS-CoV-2 infection, a prevalence five times higher than most of the United States population at the time of the study. Work environments with loud ambient noise may pose elevated risks for SARS-CoV-2 transmission. Our findings also highlight the disproportionate burden of COVID-19 among underserved and economically disadvantaged Latinx communities in the United States.

Suggested Citation

  • Melissa D Klein & Michael Sciaudone & David Richardson & Roberto Lacayo & Colleen M McClean & Oksana Kharabora & Katherine Murray & Miriana Moreno Zivanovich & Stephen Strohminger & Rachel Gurnett & A, 2022. "SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence and risk factors among meat packing, produce processing, and farm workers," PLOS Global Public Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 2(7), pages 1-12, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0000619
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0000619
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0000619
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0000619&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pgph.0000619?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0000619. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: globalpubhealth (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.