IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pgph00/0000309.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Are return-of-service bursaries an effective investment to build health workforce capacity? A qualitative study of key South African policymakers

Author

Listed:
  • Sikhumbuzo A Mabunda
  • Andrea Durbach
  • Wezile W Chitha
  • Blake Angell
  • Rohina Joshi

Abstract

Return-of-service schemes (RoS) or bursaries are used in South Africa and other nations to publicly fund the training of skilled health professionals in return for the beneficiary agreeing to return to serve in their local provinces on a year-for-year basis. This study aimed to understand insights of key policymakers in South African provinces to identify barriers and solutions to implementation of RoS schemes used to recruit and retain skilled health professionals. This research draws on the insights of 16 key South African policymakers from eight of its nine provinces through semi-structured, qualitative interviews. The respondents were interviewed through Microsoft Teams virtual platform, either in pairs (ten) or as individuals (six). Data were analysed using inductive, thematic analysis in NVIVO. The study was reported according to the consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research. Respondents reported that the schemes had resulted in an increase in the number of skilled health professionals and had provided opportunities for study and employment for previously marginalised groups. Formal evaluations of the impact of the schemes were not reported, however, a number of shortcomings with current schemes were identified that were likely limiting their effectiveness. Respondents reported a lack of foresight in the scheme implementation including a bias in the selection of beneficiaries towards medical professionals at the expense of other health workers. Furthermore, failure to plan for practice location when beneficiaries finished training limited the capacity of the schemes to meet the needs of local populations. Monitoring of recipients was limited by loopholes in contract design, decision-making and poor coordination between departments. Between 1 and 30% of beneficiaries were reported to default their contracts with some not completing their studies, some not returning after completing their internship and others terminating their services before concluding their contracts. Return-of-service schemes have helped in overcoming health professional shortages. However, they haven’t been formally evaluated. Several planning and implementation shortcomings were identified which can be improved to enhance access to healthcare in South Africa.

Suggested Citation

  • Sikhumbuzo A Mabunda & Andrea Durbach & Wezile W Chitha & Blake Angell & Rohina Joshi, 2022. "Are return-of-service bursaries an effective investment to build health workforce capacity? A qualitative study of key South African policymakers," PLOS Global Public Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 2(5), pages 1-15, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0000309
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0000309
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0000309
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0000309&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pgph.0000309?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0000309. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: globalpubhealth (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.