IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pgph00/0000093.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Perspectives of frontline health workers on transition from development assistance for health in Ghana: A qualitative study

Author

Listed:
  • Sandra Appiah-Kubi
  • Wenhui Mao
  • Augustina Koduah
  • Genevieve Cecilia Aryeetey
  • Osondu Ogbuoji
  • Justice Nonvignon

Abstract

Many Low-income countries depend on development assistance for health (DAH) to finance the health sector. The transition of these countries to middle-income status has led to reduction in effective aid from development partners while these countries are expected to graduate from global funding agencies such as Gavi the vaccine alliance, with implications for service delivery. The aim of this study was to explore the perspectives of frontline health workers regarding the implications of Ghana’s transition to middle-income status on service delivery, the likely impact and opportunities it presents to the country. This exploratory qualitative study employed in-depth interviews to collect data from 16 health workers at three hospitals in the Greater Accra Region; one at the regional level and two at the district level. The study was conducted from December 2019 to July 2020. Data from interviews were transcribed, coded and analysed using thematic analysis in NVivo Qualitative Analysis Software version 12. The level of awareness among frontline workers about the transition and decline in DAH was generally low. Nonetheless, frontline health workers perceived that the country seems inadequately prepared for transition as donors continue to be major financiers for the sector and even for emergencies such as the current COVID-19 global pandemic. Potential challenges facilities would face due to transition may include difficulty in funding health programs, human resource challenges and delays in logistics and medicines. The implications for these will be poor health outcomes, defective monitoring and evaluation, and lapses in training programs. In addition, the perceived barriers to transition identified were poor management of resources, political interference and lack of technical expertise. While opportunities such as improvement of the health sector prioritization and efficiency, private sector involvement and autonomy could be gained. Gaps in the health intervention monitoring resulting from DAH transition could pose affect health outcomes, particularly in respect of HIV, tuberculosis and malaria. The country’s preparedness to transition from DAH could be better improved with development of a clear transition plan agreed by stakeholders, including government and in-country development partners. For the health sector, the eligibility for DAH transition should not simply be based on economic growth, but importantly on a country’s ability to sustain ongoing and upcoming health programs.

Suggested Citation

  • Sandra Appiah-Kubi & Wenhui Mao & Augustina Koduah & Genevieve Cecilia Aryeetey & Osondu Ogbuoji & Justice Nonvignon, 2022. "Perspectives of frontline health workers on transition from development assistance for health in Ghana: A qualitative study," PLOS Global Public Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 2(4), pages 1-14, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0000093
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0000093
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0000093
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0000093&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pgph.0000093?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0000093. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: globalpubhealth (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.