Author
Listed:
- Siva Sankari
- Markus F F Arnold
- Vignesh M P Babu
- Michael Deutsch
- Graham C Walker
Abstract
Elucidation of the complex mechanisms of action of antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) is critical for improving their efficacy. A major challenge in AMP research is distinguishing AMP effects resulting from various protein interactions from those caused by membrane disruption. Moreover, since AMPs often act in multiple cellular compartments, it is challenging to pinpoint where their distinct activities occur. Nodule-specific cysteine-rich (NCR) peptides secreted by some legumes, including NCR247, have evolved from AMPs to regulate differentiation of their nitrogen-fixing bacterial partner during symbiosis as well as to exert antimicrobial actions. At sub-lethal concentrations, NCR247 exhibits strikingly pleiotropic effects on Sinorhizobium meliloti. We used the L- and D-enantiomeric forms of NCR247 to distinguish between phenotypes resulting from stereospecific, protein-targeted interactions and those caused by non-specific interactions such as membrane disruption. In addition, we utilized an S. meliloti strain lacking BacA, a transporter that imports NCR peptides into the cytoplasm. The bacterial protein BacA, plays critical symbiotic roles by possibly reducing periplasmic peptide accumulation and fine-tuning symbiotic signaling. Use of the BacA-deficient strain made it possible to distinguish between phenotypes resulting from peptide interactions in the periplasm and those occurring in the cytoplasm. At high concentrations, both L- and D-NCR247 permeabilize bacterial membranes, consistent with nonspecific cationic AMP activity. In the cytoplasm, both NCR247 enantiomers sequester heme and trigger iron starvation in a chirality-independent but BacA-dependent manner. However, only L-NCR247 activates bacterial two-component systems via stereospecific periplasmic interactions. By combining stereochemistry and genetics, this work disentangles the spatial and molecular complexity of NCR247 action. This approach provides critical mechanistic insights into how host peptides with pleiotropic functions modulate bacterial physiology.Author summary: Many organisms produce antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) to fight infections, but some legumes have uniquely co-opted these molecules to control their symbiotic partners. During symbiosis between Medicago truncatula and Sinorhizobium meliloti, the plant secreted Nodule-specific Cysteine-Rich (NCR) peptides, transforms free-living bacteria into differentiated bacteroids that fix nitrogen but cannot reproduce outside the host. One such peptide, NCR247, exerts pleiotropic effects on the bacteria, acting on different subcellular locations, including membrane, heme, and proteins. Using a mirror-image (D-form) peptide, we disentangled peptide effects arising from generic physiochemical interactions versus stereospecific binding. The bacterial inner membrane protein BacA is known to play a protective role by importing NCR peptides into the cytoplasm. Using a bacterium lacking BacA, we were able to distinguish the effects of the peptide within and outside the cytoplasm. It was thought that BacA safeguards symbiotic bacteria by internalizing NCR peptides, thereby limiting their toxic membrane-lytic effects; however, this has not been demonstrated. Our results allow us to infer that BacA prevents lethal overstimulation of signaling pathways in the periplasm by internalizing the peptides. Our methods provide a framework for testing the mechanism of action of new peptide-based antibiotics to combat multidrug-resistant bacteria.
Suggested Citation
Siva Sankari & Markus F F Arnold & Vignesh M P Babu & Michael Deutsch & Graham C Walker, 2025.
"Exploiting peptide chirality and transport to dissect the complex mechanism of action of host peptides on bacteria,"
PLOS Genetics, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(12), pages 1-19, December.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pgen00:1011892
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1011892
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pgen00:1011892. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosgenetics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.