IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pgen00/1011822.html

Detecting latent interaction effects when analyzing binary traits

Author

Listed:
  • Ziang Zhang
  • Jerald F Lawless
  • Andrew D Paterson
  • Lei Sun

Abstract

In genome-wide association studies (GWAS), it is often desirable to test for interactions, such as gene–environment (GxE) or gene–gene (GxG) interactions, between single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs, G’s) and environmental variables (E’s). However, directly accounting for interaction is often infeasible, because the interacting variable is latent or the computational burden is too large. For quantitative traits (Y) that are approximately normally distributed, it has been shown that indirect testing on GxE can be done by testing for heteroskedasticity of Y between genotypes. However, when traits are binary, the existing methodology based on testing the heteroskedasticity of the trait across genotypes cannot be generalized. In this paper, we propose an approach to indirectly test interaction effects for binary traits and subsequently propose a joint test that accounts for the main and interaction effects of each SNP during GWAS. The final method is straightforward to implement in practice—it simply involves adding a non-additive (i.e., dominance) term to standard GWAS additive models for binary traits and testing its significance. We illustrate the statistical features including type-I-error control and power of the proposed method through extensive numerical studies. Applying our method to the UK Biobank dataset, we showcase the practical utility of the proposed method, revealing SNPs and genes with strong potential for latent interaction effects.

Suggested Citation

  • Ziang Zhang & Jerald F Lawless & Andrew D Paterson & Lei Sun, 2025. "Detecting latent interaction effects when analyzing binary traits," PLOS Genetics, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(8), pages 1-17, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pgen00:1011822
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1011822
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1011822
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1011822&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pgen.1011822?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cramer,J. S., 2011. "Logit Models from Economics and Other Fields," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521188036, Enero-Abr.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Annemiek Vuren & Daniel Vuuren, 2007. "Financial Incentives in Disability Insurance in the Netherlands," De Economist, Springer, vol. 155(1), pages 73-98, March.
    2. Gordon Kemp & João Santos Silva, 2016. "Partial effects in fixed-effects models," United Kingdom Stata Users' Group Meetings 2016 06, Stata Users Group.
    3. repec:plo:pone00:0000244 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Trinh, Thoai Quang & Rañola, Roberto F. & Camacho, Leni D. & Simelton, Elisabeth, 2018. "Determinants of farmers’ adaptation to climate change in agricultural production in the central region of Vietnam," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 224-231.
    5. Karacuka, Mehmet & Çatık, A. Nazif & Haucap, Justus, 2013. "Consumer choice and local network effects in mobile telecommunications in Turkey," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(4), pages 334-344.
    6. Viktoria Graskemper & Xiaohua Yu & Jan‐Henning Feil, 2021. "Analyzing strategic entrepreneurial choices in agriculture—Empirical evidence from Germany," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 37(3), pages 569-589, July.
    7. Guido, Cataife, 2007. "The pronouncements of paranoid politicians," MPRA Paper 4473, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Nuria Ceular-Villamandos & Virginia Navajas-Romero & Lorena Caridad y López del Río & Lucia Zita Zambrano-Santos, 2021. "Workplace Situation and Well-Being of Ecuadorian Self-Employed," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-26, February.
    9. Maalouf, Maher & Trafalis, Theodore B., 2011. "Robust weighted kernel logistic regression in imbalanced and rare events data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 55(1), pages 168-183, January.
    10. Damian Walczak & Dorota Krupa, 2020. "Exchange Transactions and Socioeconomic Determinants of Solidarity: The Case of Post-Solidarity Poland," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3), pages 364-377.
    11. Beate Henschel, 2008. "Why is the share of women willing to work in East Germany larger than in West Germany? A logit model of extensive labour supply decision," ifo Working Paper Series 56, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich.
    12. Jaap Boter & Jan Rouwendal & Michel Wedel, 2005. "Employing Travel Time to Compare the Value of Competing Cultural Organizations," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 29(1), pages 19-33, February.
    13. Donato Masciandaro, 2012. "Determinants of Financial Supervision Regimes: Markets, Institutions, Politics, Law or Geography?," Chapters, in: Kern Alexander & Rahul Dhumale (ed.), Research Handbook on International Financial Regulation, chapter 14, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    14. Freeman, Elizabeth A. & Moisen, Gretchen G., 2008. "A comparison of the performance of threshold criteria for binary classification in terms of predicted prevalence and kappa," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 217(1), pages 48-58.
    15. Agnieszka Kurdyś-Kujawska & Agnieszka Strzelecka & Danuta Zawadzka, 2021. "The Impact of Crop Diversification on the Economic Efficiency of Small Farms in Poland," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-21, March.
    16. Christopher Marston & Francis Raoul & Clare Rowland & Jean-Pierre Quéré & Xiaohui Feng & Renyong Lin & Patrick Giraudoux, 2023. "Mapping small mammal optimal habitats using satellite-derived proxy variables and species distribution models," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(8), pages 1-20, August.
    17. Paolo Coccorese & Alfonso Pellecchia, 2006. "Local Tourism Features in Italy: A Binomial Logit Analysis," Tourism Economics, , vol. 12(4), pages 565-583, December.
    18. Jerzy Marzec & Stanisław Czyż & Piotr Styrkowiec, 2015. "Grouped probit regression analysis for shooting effectiveness in basketball," Collegium of Economic Analysis Annals, Warsaw School of Economics, Collegium of Economic Analysis, issue 39, pages 135-150.
    19. Stephan F. Gohmann, 2012. "Institutions, Latent Entrepreneurship, and Self–Employment: An International Comparison," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 36(2), pages 295-321, March.
    20. Robert Kapłon, 2006. "A retrospective review of categorical data analysis – theory and marketing practice," Operations Research and Decisions, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Management, vol. 16(1), pages 55-72.
    21. Annemiek Vuren & Daniel Vuuren, 2007. "Financial Incentives in Disability Insurance in the Netherlands," De Economist, Springer, vol. 155(1), pages 73-98, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pgen00:1011822. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosgenetics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.