Author
Listed:
- Jenna C Carlson
- Xinyi Zhang
- Zeynep Erdogan-Yildirim
- Terri H Beaty
- Azeez Butali
- Carmen J Buxó
- Lord JJ Gowans
- Jacqueline T Hecht
- Ross E Long
- Lina Moreno
- Jeffrey C Murray
- Ieda M Orioli
- Carmencita Padilla
- George L Wehby
- Eleanor Feingold
- Elizabeth J Leslie-Clarkson
- Seth M Weinberg
- Mary L Marazita
- John R Shaffer
Abstract
Nonsyndromic orofacial clefts (OFCs) are common, heritable birth defects caused by both genetic and environmental risk factors. Despite the identification of many genetic loci harboring OFC-risk variants, there are many unknown genetic determinants of OFC. Furthermore, while the process of embryonic facial development is well characterized, the molecular mechanisms that underly it are not. This represents a major hurdle in understanding how disruptions in these biological processes result in OFC. Thus, we sought to identify novel OFC-risk loci through a genome-wide multi-ancestry study of five nested OFC phenotypes (isolated cleft lip [CLO], isolated cleft palate [CPO], cleft lip and palate [CLP], cleft lip with/without cleft palate [CL/P], and any cleft [ANY]) representing distinct cleft subtypes to identify subtype-specific signals and grouped types to maximize power to detect shared genetic effects. We performed genome-wide meta-analyses of these five OFC phenotypes from three cohorts totaling >14,000 individuals using METAL. In addition to replicating 13 known OFC-risk loci, we observed novel association in three regions: the 1p36.32 locus (lead variant rs584402, an intergenic variant, pCLO = 3.14e-8), the 7q33 locus (lead variant rs17168118, an intronic variant in CALD1, pCLP = 9.17e-9), and the 16p13.3 locus (lead variant rs77075754, an intronic variant in RBFOX1, pCL/P = 1.53e-9, pANY = 1.93e-9). We also observed a novel association within the known risk locus 8q22.1 that was independent of the previously reported signal (lead variant rs4735314, an intronic variant in ESRP1, pCLP = 1.07e-9, pCL/P = 3.88e-8). Next, we performed multi-tissue TWAS with s-MulTiXcan and identified four overlapping genes with significant genetically predicted transcription associated with OFC risk. These genes also overlapped the genome-wide significant association signals from the meta-analysis, including CALD1 and ESRP1 and known OFC-risk genes TANC2 and NTN1. Each of the newly reported loci has potential regulatory effects, including evidence of craniofacial enhancer activity, that offer new clues as to the molecule mechanisms underlying embryonic facial development.Author summary: Orofacial clefts, including cleft lip and cleft palate, are common birth defects that can be caused by both genetic and environmental factors. While many of these factors are known, there are still significant gaps in our understanding of how and why clefts arise. To help address this deficiency, we measured association between variants across the genome and clefting in cases and controls from diverse genetic ancestries. We identified three new candidate genes (CALD1, ESRP1, and RBFOX1) that may be involved in cleft risk and reaffirmed the role of 12 previously reported risk genes. We also found evidence that clefting was associated with predicted gene expression at CALD1 and ESRP1 and that the associated variants in these genes were located near regions known to be involved in the regulation of gene expression in craniofacial tissues during development.
Suggested Citation
Jenna C Carlson & Xinyi Zhang & Zeynep Erdogan-Yildirim & Terri H Beaty & Azeez Butali & Carmen J Buxó & Lord JJ Gowans & Jacqueline T Hecht & Ross E Long & Lina Moreno & Jeffrey C Murray & Ieda M Ori, 2025.
"Variants in CALD1, ESRP1, and RBFOX1 are associated with orofacial cleft risk,"
PLOS Genetics, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(9), pages 1-21, September.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pgen00:1011581
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1011581
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pgen00:1011581. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosgenetics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.