IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pgen00/1009564.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

From musk to body odor: Decoding olfaction through genetic variation

Author

Listed:
  • Bingjie Li
  • Marissa L Kamarck
  • Qianqian Peng
  • Fei-Ling Lim
  • Andreas Keller
  • Monique A M Smeets
  • Joel D Mainland
  • Sijia Wang

Abstract

The olfactory system combines input from multiple receptor types to represent odor information, but there are few explicit examples relating olfactory receptor (OR) activity patterns to odor perception. To uncover these relationships, we performed genome-wide scans on odor-perception phenotypes for ten odors in 1000 Han Chinese and validated results for six of these odors in an ethnically diverse population (n = 364). In both populations, consistent with previous studies, we replicated three previously reported associations (β-ionone/OR5A1, androstenone/OR7D4, cis-3-hexen-1-ol/OR2J3 LD-band), but not for odors containing aldehydes, suggesting that olfactory phenotype/genotype studies are robust across populations. Two novel associations between an OR and odor perception contribute to our understanding of olfactory coding. First, we found a SNP in OR51B2 that associated with trans-3-methyl-2-hexenoic acid, a key component of human underarm odor. Second, we found two linked SNPs associated with the musk Galaxolide in a novel musk receptor, OR4D6, which is also the first human OR shown to drive specific anosmia to a musk compound. We noticed that SNPs detected for odor intensity were enriched with amino acid substitutions, implying functional changes of odor receptors. Furthermore, we also found that the derived alleles of the SNPs tend to be associated with reduced odor intensity, supporting the hypothesis that the primate olfactory gene repertoire has degenerated over time. This study provides information about coding for human body odor, and gives us insight into broader mechanisms of olfactory coding, such as how differential OR activation can converge on a similar percept.Author summary: Although genetic diversity in the olfactory receptor repertoire contributes to variation in odor perception, we have few explicit predictions relating variation in a specific OR to perception. Here, we performed genome-wide scans on odor-perception phenotypes for ten odors in 1000 Han Chinese and validated results for six of these odors in an ethnically diverse population (n = 364). We identified novel receptors for musk and human body odor that have implications for how structurally different molecules can have similar odors. Summarizing all the published genetic variation that associates with odor perception, we found that individuals with ancestral versions of the receptors tend to rate the corresponding odor as more intense, supporting the hypothesis that the primate olfactory gene repertoire has degenerated over time. This study of olfactory genetic and perceptual variation will improve our understanding of how the olfactory system encodes odor properties.

Suggested Citation

  • Bingjie Li & Marissa L Kamarck & Qianqian Peng & Fei-Ling Lim & Andreas Keller & Monique A M Smeets & Joel D Mainland & Sijia Wang, 2022. "From musk to body odor: Decoding olfaction through genetic variation," PLOS Genetics, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(2), pages 1-27, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pgen00:1009564
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1009564
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1009564
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1009564&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pgen.1009564?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pgen00:1009564. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosgenetics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.