IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pgen00/1005631.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

GBStools: A Statistical Method for Estimating Allelic Dropout in Reduced Representation Sequencing Data

Author

Listed:
  • Thomas F Cooke
  • Muh-Ching Yee
  • Marina Muzzio
  • Alexandra Sockell
  • Ryan Bell
  • Omar E Cornejo
  • Joanna L Kelley
  • Graciela Bailliet
  • Claudio M Bravi
  • Carlos D Bustamante
  • Eimear E Kenny

Abstract

Reduced representation sequencing methods such as genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) enable low-cost measurement of genetic variation without the need for a reference genome assembly. These methods are widely used in genetic mapping and population genetics studies, especially with non-model organisms. Variant calling error rates, however, are higher in GBS than in standard sequencing, in particular due to restriction site polymorphisms, and few computational tools exist that specifically model and correct these errors. We developed a statistical method to remove errors caused by restriction site polymorphisms, implemented in the software package GBStools. We evaluated it in several simulated data sets, varying in number of samples, mean coverage and population mutation rate, and in two empirical human data sets (N = 8 and N = 63 samples). In our simulations, GBStools improved genotype accuracy more than commonly used filters such as Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium p-values. GBStools is most effective at removing genotype errors in data sets over 100 samples when coverage is 40X or higher, and the improvement is most pronounced in species with high genomic diversity. We also demonstrate the utility of GBS and GBStools for human population genetic inference in Argentine populations and reveal widely varying individual ancestry proportions and an excess of singletons, consistent with recent population growth.Author Summary: Eukaryotic genomes range from millions to billions of base pairs in size, but for many genetic experiments it is sufficient to gather information from just a fraction of these sites. In practice, selecting a consistent set of sites can be achieved by cutting genomic DNA with enzymes that recognize DNA sequence motifs, and then sequencing the ends of the resulting fragments. The advantages of this well-known approach are its low cost relative to whole-genome sequencing (WGS) and that it does not require a sequenced genome. These methods, for example genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS), are popular for mapping genes and studying population genetics, particularly in non-model organisms. Here we demonstrate, however, that computational tools designed for WGS are insufficient for handling certain error types that arise in GBS and other similar methods. We present a modified protocol for GBS and a statistical method for detecting these errors, implemented in the software package GBStools. We tested our methods on human DNA samples from Argentine populations. Our results reveal widely varying degrees of European and Native American ancestry, and that rare genetic variants are more numerous than would be expected in a population with constant size.

Suggested Citation

  • Thomas F Cooke & Muh-Ching Yee & Marina Muzzio & Alexandra Sockell & Ryan Bell & Omar E Cornejo & Joanna L Kelley & Graciela Bailliet & Claudio M Bravi & Carlos D Bustamante & Eimear E Kenny, 2016. "GBStools: A Statistical Method for Estimating Allelic Dropout in Reduced Representation Sequencing Data," PLOS Genetics, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(2), pages 1-18, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pgen00:1005631
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1005631
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1005631
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1005631&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pgen.1005631?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pgen00:1005631. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosgenetics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.