IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pgen00/1000694.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Meta-Analysis of the INSIG2 Association with Obesity Including 74,345 Individuals: Does Heterogeneity of Estimates Relate to Study Design?

Author

Listed:
  • Iris M Heid
  • Cornelia Huth
  • Ruth J F Loos
  • Florian Kronenberg
  • Vera Adamkova
  • Sonia S Anand
  • Kristin Ardlie
  • Heike Biebermann
  • Peter Bjerregaard
  • Heiner Boeing
  • Claude Bouchard
  • Marina Ciullo
  • Jackie A Cooper
  • Dolores Corella
  • Christian Dina
  • James C Engert
  • Eva Fisher
  • Francesc Francès
  • Philippe Froguel
  • Johannes Hebebrand
  • Robert A Hegele
  • Anke Hinney
  • Margret R Hoehe
  • Frank B Hu
  • Jaroslav A Hubacek
  • Steve E Humphries
  • Steven C Hunt
  • Thomas Illig
  • Marjo-Riita Järvelin
  • Marika Kaakinen
  • Barbara Kollerits
  • Heiko Krude
  • Jitender Kumar
  • Leslie A Lange
  • Birgit Langer
  • Shengxu Li
  • Andreas Luchner
  • Helen N Lyon
  • David Meyre
  • Karen L Mohlke
  • Vincent Mooser
  • Almut Nebel
  • Thuy Trang Nguyen
  • Bernhard Paulweber
  • Louis Perusse
  • Lu Qi
  • Tuomo Rankinen
  • Dieter Rosskopf
  • Stefan Schreiber
  • Shantanu Sengupta
  • Rossella Sorice
  • Anita Suk
  • Gudmar Thorleifsson
  • Unnur Thorsteinsdottir
  • Henry Völzke
  • Karani S Vimaleswaran
  • Nicholas J Wareham
  • Dawn Waterworth
  • Salim Yusuf
  • Cecilia Lindgren
  • Mark I McCarthy
  • Christoph Lange
  • Joel N Hirschhorn
  • Nan Laird
  • H-Erich Wichmann

Abstract

The INSIG2 rs7566605 polymorphism was identified for obesity (BMI≥30 kg/m2) in one of the first genome-wide association studies, but replications were inconsistent. We collected statistics from 34 studies (n = 74,345), including general population (GP) studies, population-based studies with subjects selected for conditions related to a better health status (‘healthy population’, HP), and obesity studies (OB). We tested five hypotheses to explore potential sources of heterogeneity. The meta-analysis of 27 studies on Caucasian adults (n = 66,213) combining the different study designs did not support overall association of the CC-genotype with obesity, yielding an odds ratio (OR) of 1.05 (p-value = 0.27). The I2 measure of 41% (p-value = 0.015) indicated between-study heterogeneity. Restricting to GP studies resulted in a declined I2 measure of 11% (p-value = 0.33) and an OR of 1.10 (p-value = 0.015). Regarding the five hypotheses, our data showed (a) some difference between GP and HP studies (p-value = 0.012) and (b) an association in extreme comparisons (BMI≥32.5, 35.0, 37.5, 40.0 kg/m2 versus BMI

Suggested Citation

  • Iris M Heid & Cornelia Huth & Ruth J F Loos & Florian Kronenberg & Vera Adamkova & Sonia S Anand & Kristin Ardlie & Heike Biebermann & Peter Bjerregaard & Heiner Boeing & Claude Bouchard & Marina Ciul, 2009. "Meta-Analysis of the INSIG2 Association with Obesity Including 74,345 Individuals: Does Heterogeneity of Estimates Relate to Study Design?," PLOS Genetics, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(10), pages 1-10, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pgen00:1000694
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000694
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1000694
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1000694&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pgen.1000694?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pgen00:1000694. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosgenetics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.