IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pdig00/0001749.html

Contribution of artificial intelligence research to the development of inclusive applications for people with disabilities: A scoping review (2015–2025)

Author

Listed:
  • Soutongnoma Safiata Kaboré
  • Azadeh Bayani
  • Léandre Parfait Epoh Ewane
  • Davllyn Santos Oliveira dos Anjos
  • Jean Noel Nikiéma
  • Muriel Mac-Seing

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly transforming healthcare. Yet people with disabilities (PWD), representing 16% of the global population, remain disproportionately excluded from these advances. This exclusion is driven by algorithmic bias, non-representative datasets, and limited involvement of PWD in the design, development, and evaluation of AI applications. This scoping review examines the extent to which AI research in health contributes to the development of inclusive technologies for PWD, focusing on equity considerations. It identifies current trends, methodological gaps, and opportunities for socially responsive innovation. We conducted a systematic search across MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and CINAHL for the 2015–2025 period, following Arksey and O’Malley’s five-stage scoping review methodology and the PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Data were extracted and synthesized thematically using the Population-Concept-Context approach. Of 4,233 references retrieved, 93 studies were included. Most studies originated from high-income countries, particularly in North America (45.2%) and Europe (26.9%). AI applications addressed motor, sensory, cognitive, communication-related, and psychosocial disabilities, with emphasis on prediction/diagnosis, assistive technologies, and personalized care. While about 60% of studies referenced equity, only 12 (12.9%) implemented concrete measures (e.g., adapting tools for vulnerable groups or ensuring sample diversity), and only six (6.5%) actively involved PWD through co-design or user validation. AI holds significant potential to enhance autonomy, access, and quality of life for PWD. Realizing this promise will require moving beyond technical optimization to embrace inclusive design, participatory methods, and equity-driven frameworks aligned with responsible AI development and use.Author summary: People with disabilities (PWD) are frequently underrepresented in the design, development, implementation, and evaluation of artificial intelligence (AI) systems, which can limit the accessibility, usability, and equity of these technologies, and result failing to address their diverse needs and lived experiences. It is therefore essential to evaluate the extent to which PWD are meaningfully involved across all stages of AI development and research. In this scoping review, we examined their roles from multiple perspectives. Our review explored how healthcare AI research contributes to the development of inclusive and accessible technologies for PWD. We identified studies addressing a wide range of disabilities and AI applications, including predictive models, assistive technologies, early screening tools, and decision-support systems. Overall, our findings highlight the growing recognition of inclusive AI development while demonstrating that meaningful participation, accessibility, transparency, and context-sensitive implementation remain inconsistently addressed. Based on these findings, we identify key gaps in the current literature and provide recommendations to guide the development of more equitable, accessible, and person-centered AI systems for people with disabilities.

Suggested Citation

  • Soutongnoma Safiata Kaboré & Azadeh Bayani & Léandre Parfait Epoh Ewane & Davllyn Santos Oliveira dos Anjos & Jean Noel Nikiéma & Muriel Mac-Seing, 2026. "Contribution of artificial intelligence research to the development of inclusive applications for people with disabilities: A scoping review (2015–2025)," PLOS Digital Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(10), pages 1-20, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pdig00:0001749
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0001749
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/digitalhealth/article?id=10.1371/journal.pdig.0001749
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/digitalhealth/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pdig.0001749&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pdig.0001749?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pdig00:0001749. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: digitalhealth (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/digitalhealth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.