IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pdig00/0001685.html

A feasibility study evaluating seismocardiography for the detection of heart failure

Author

Listed:
  • Ahmad Agam
  • Emil Korsgaard
  • Troels Yding Haugstrup
  • Kasper Janus Grønn Emerek
  • Maria Weinkouff Pedersen
  • Massar Omar
  • Jacob Eifer Møller
  • Kristian Kragholm
  • Samuel Emil Schmidt
  • Peter Søgaard

Abstract

The study aimed to develop a seismocardiograph (SCG)- based algorithm and assess its diagnostic performance in the detection of heart failure (HF). A total of 218 subjects were included: 198 with suspected HF and 20 with known HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) were included for testing only. Assessments were conducted using SCG, N-terminal pro b-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), electrocardiogram, NYHA classification and echocardiography. SCG-based algorithms, “AnyHF score” were developed to identify all subtypes of HF and “HFrEF-score” to identify HFrEF. Diagnostic accuracy was assessed using sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and the area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC). The AnyHF score demonstrated an AUC of 82%, sensitivity of 90.9%, specificity of 43.8%, NPV of 87.5% and PPV of 52.6% in detecting HF versus no HF. A balanced comparative analysis was performed between NT-proBNP and the HFrEF-score for detecting HFrEF versus no HF. NT-proBNP demonstrated an AUC of 94.7%, sensitivity 94.1%, specificity 68.8%, NPV 99%, and PPV 27.1%. The HFrEF-score showed an AUC of 92.9%, sensitivity 88.2%, specificity 92% (p

Suggested Citation

  • Ahmad Agam & Emil Korsgaard & Troels Yding Haugstrup & Kasper Janus Grønn Emerek & Maria Weinkouff Pedersen & Massar Omar & Jacob Eifer Møller & Kristian Kragholm & Samuel Emil Schmidt & Peter Søgaard, 2026. "A feasibility study evaluating seismocardiography for the detection of heart failure," PLOS Digital Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(9), pages 1-14, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pdig00:0001685
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0001685
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/digitalhealth/article?id=10.1371/journal.pdig.0001685
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/digitalhealth/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pdig.0001685&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pdig.0001685?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pdig00:0001685. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: digitalhealth (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/digitalhealth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.