Author
Listed:
- Filip Depta
- Surya P Bhatt
- Manuel Heinz
- Radek Černý
- Vladimír Koblížek
- Pavol Pobeha
Abstract
Based on the principle that increased airway resistance prolongs the expiratory time constant (TC), we investigated whether TC patterns could serve as a signature for obstruction. In this cross-sectional multicenter study of 19,937 validated spirometry records, we divided the descending expiratory flow-volume curve into five equal volume segments and derived consecutive TCs for each. A K-means algorithm trained on the normal subset defined data-driven patterns, which were then used to classify the entire cohort. We quantified pattern prevalence and used propensity score matching to assess spirometric differences between patterns within each spirometric category. Two distinct patterns were identified: a ‘normal’ pattern (stable consecutive TCs) and an ‘obstructive’ pattern (progressively prolonging TCs). The obstructive pattern was present in 7% of normal spirometry, 13% of possible restriction, and 33% of nonspecific FEV1 reduction, while 9% of patients meeting obstruction criteria had a normal TC pattern. In normal spirometry group, the obstructive pattern group showed lower forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) (males: 2.7 vs 3.0 L; females: 1.8 vs 2.0 L), reduced FEV1/forced vital capacity (FVC) (males: 67% vs 76%; females: 68% vs 78%), and impaired small airway metrics, including maximal mid-expiratory flow (MMEF25–75) (males: 1.6 vs 2.6 L/s; females: 1.0 vs 1.8 L/s) and FEV3/FEV6 (males: 91% vs 94%; females: 91% vs 95%), all p
Suggested Citation
Filip Depta & Surya P Bhatt & Manuel Heinz & Radek Černý & Vladimír Koblížek & Pavol Pobeha, 2026.
"Expiratory time constant patterns reveal obstructive lung mechanics in non-obstructive spirometry,"
PLOS Digital Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(8), pages 1-17, August.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pdig00:0001653
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0001653
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pdig00:0001653. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: digitalhealth (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/digitalhealth .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.