IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pdig00/0001554.html

Knowledge graph-guided multiple sclerosis identification and therapeutic trend analysis: Real-world evidence from two large healthcare systems

Author

Listed:
  • Ziming Gan
  • Wen Zhu
  • Weijing Tang
  • Sara Morini Sweet
  • Michele Morris
  • Yunqing Han
  • Chenyi Chen
  • Junwei Lu
  • Emily Song
  • Mohammed Moro
  • Shyam Visweswaran
  • Tianrun Cai
  • Tanuja Chitnis
  • Tianxi Cai
  • Zongqi Xia

Abstract

The multiple sclerosis (MS) therapeutic landscape has evolved over time. We conducted a knowledge graph-guided analysis of MS-specific disease-modifying therapy (DMT) prescription trends using longitudinal real-world clinical data. We analyzed registry-linked electronic health record (EHR) data from two large independent healthcare systems between 2004 and 2022, including both academic and community practices. We developed an unsupervised phenotyping algorithm that leverages a publicly available knowledge graph and informative EHR features to identify patients with MS. After identifying MS cases, we combined the two cohorts and constructed annual time-varying knowledge graphs that capture co-occurrence patterns between DMTs and MS diagnosis. For each year, we analyzed co-occurrence patterns between DMTs and MS diagnosis using Shifted Positive Pointwise Mutual Information transformation and singular value decomposition to generate embeddings. We computed patient-wise cosine similarities and confidence intervals to quantify MS-specific DMT usage patterns. The phenotyping algorithm achieved robust performance in predicting MS diagnosis (AUROC: MGB = 0.994, UPMC = 0.922), identifying 29,169 MS patients in the combined dataset. Among commonly used standard-effectiveness DMTs, MS-specific prescriptions declined after 2011 for interferon-beta (DMT-MS cosine similarity slope = −0.019 ± 0.011, p = 0.002) and glatiramer acetate (slope = −0.013 ± 0.012, p = 0.026), from 2013–2020 for fumarates (slope = −0.028 ± 0.015, p = 0.004), and after 2014 for S1P receptor modulators (slope = −0.026 ± 0.016, p = 0.005). Among commonly used higher-effectiveness DMTs, B-cell depletion therapies (slope = 0.051 ± 0.027, p = 0.001), particularly ocrelizumab (slope = 0.020 ± 0.016, p =0.032), showed a marked increase since 2018. Natalizumab usage peaked in 2011 (slopepre-2011 = 0.063 ± 0.013, ppre-2011

Suggested Citation

  • Ziming Gan & Wen Zhu & Weijing Tang & Sara Morini Sweet & Michele Morris & Yunqing Han & Chenyi Chen & Junwei Lu & Emily Song & Mohammed Moro & Shyam Visweswaran & Tianrun Cai & Tanuja Chitnis & Tianx, 2026. "Knowledge graph-guided multiple sclerosis identification and therapeutic trend analysis: Real-world evidence from two large healthcare systems," PLOS Digital Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(8), pages 1-15, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pdig00:0001554
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0001554
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/digitalhealth/article?id=10.1371/journal.pdig.0001554
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/digitalhealth/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pdig.0001554&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pdig.0001554?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pdig00:0001554. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: digitalhealth (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/digitalhealth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.