Author
Listed:
- Sarah J Iribarren
- Jason Rupp
- Jennifer Sprecher
- Barry Lutz
- Fernando Rubinstein
Abstract
Digital adherence technologies (DATs) may improve health behaviors only when users engage, but links between engagement, user factors, and outcomes are unclear. TB Treatment Support Tools (TB-TST) is a DAT with a smartphone app connecting patients to treatment supporters and weekly drug metabolite testing. We evaluated TB-TST app engagement in a pragmatic randomized controlled trial and identified factors associated with adherence and treatment outcomes. Engagement was measured from app interactions by 277 participants over 180-days of TB treatment. Adherence was assessed via daily self-reports and weekly metabolite-test photo submissions. Participants could also message treatment supporters, report side effects, or request help. We modeled time to non-adherence (28 consecutive days without reporting) using survival analysis. Logistic regression tested associations of adherence and engagement with treatment outcomes. A latent engagement score was derived using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) from medication reports, photo submissions, side-effect reports, messaging, and overall adherence. Participants submitted 24,902 medication reports, 2,926 messages, 2,465 photos, 1235 side effect reports, and 128 help requests. Adherence declined over time (78% at 60 days; 50% at 180 days). Non-adherence was more common among males, participants living at or below the poverty line, those without stable employment, and those treated at certain hospitals. Non-adherence was associated with lower odds of treatment success (OR 0.48, 95% CI: 0.22 - 0.94) and higher odds of loss to follow-up (OR 2.1, 95% CI: 1.03 - 4.7), adjusting for sex, age, education, income, and employment. Higher engagement scores were associated with higher odds of success (OR 2.2 times per standard deviation increase). Engagement with TB-TST was associated with improved TB treatment outcomes. Strategies to increase and sustain engagement, particularly among high-risk groups, may improve adherence and maximize DAT benefits.Author summary: Tuberculosis treatment lasts for many months, and interruption or incomplete therapy can lead to drug resistance and other poor outcomes. We studied how people used a smartphone-based support tool during tuberculosis self-administered treatment and whether more consistent use was linked to better outcomes. Digital tools can help patients take medications regularly, but they only work if people continue to use them over time. In our trial, the tool allowed participants to report when they took their daily dose, share a weekly photo of a simple test that indicates recent medication use, and communicate with a treatment supporter when they had questions, side effects, or needed help. We found that engagement with the tool decreased as treatment went on. People were more likely to stop reporting for long periods if they were men, had low income, lacked stable employment, or received care at non-referral hospitals. Importantly, people who stopped reporting were less likely to complete treatment successfully and more likely to be lost to follow-up. In contrast, people who used the tool more consistently had better treatment outcomes. These results suggest that digital support can strengthen tuberculosis care, but programs should invest in practical ways to keep people engaged, especially among groups at higher risk of falling behind.
Suggested Citation
Sarah J Iribarren & Jason Rupp & Jennifer Sprecher & Barry Lutz & Fernando Rubinstein, 2026.
"User engagement in the tuberculosis treatment support tools intervention and its impact on treatment outcomes: A secondary analysis of a pragmatic trial,"
PLOS Digital Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(7), pages 1-16, July.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pdig00:0001457
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0001457
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pdig00:0001457. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: digitalhealth (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/digitalhealth .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.