IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pdig00/0001411.html

Deep-learning time-series anomaly detection of acute kidney injury from creatinine–eGFR trajectories in the ICU

Author

Listed:
  • Yoonjin Kang
  • Soojeong Yun
  • Seung Min Song
  • Ji Eun Kim
  • Hyo Jin Kim
  • Eun Jung Cho
  • Shin Young Ahn
  • Young Joo Kwon
  • Min Woo Kang

Abstract

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is common in the intensive care unit (ICU), and fixed creatinine thresholds may miss clinically relevant dynamics. We tested whether a deep-learning anomaly signal from short creatinine–estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) series complements conventional criteria for risk stratification. Seven-step daily creatinine–eGFR instances were built from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC-III/IV; development/internal validation) and the eICU Collaborative Research Database (external validation). Time series began within 48 hours before ICU admission and ended at kidney replacement therapy (KRT), death, or ICU discharge. An unsupervised Anomaly Transformer trained on MIMIC produced final-step anomaly scores; the 95th percentile of training scores defined a fixed threshold. Anomaly-detected AKI required a final-step creatinine rise plus a score ≥ threshold. We compared scores across Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) stages and evaluated 24–96-hour KRT and mortality using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), accuracy, and F1-score. After exclusions, the internal dataset included 81,876 admissions (381,700 time-series instances) and the external dataset 140,237 admissions (494,684 instances). Anomaly scores increased stepwise across KDIGO categories and were higher in windows followed by KRT or death. For KRT prediction at 24, 48, 72, and 96 hours, AUROCs were 0.83, 0.82, 0.81, and 0.80 internally and 0.74 at all horizons externally. For mortality, AUROCs were 0.64–0.66 internally and 0.62–0.64 externally. In threshold-based classification, F1-scores were generally highest with the anomaly rule alone, whereas accuracy was greatest when requiring both anomaly detection and KDIGO stage ≥2. Event-capture analyses showed that anomaly detection identified more near-term KRT and mortality events than KDIGO stage ≥2, with the clearest separation for KRT. A creatinine–eGFR trajectory-based anomaly signal aligned with clinical severity, was associated with near-term outcomes, and appeared to complement KDIGO-based criteria in ICU populations.Author summary: We look after many critically ill patients whose kidneys suddenly become damaged. Doctors usually diagnose this “acute kidney injury” by asking whether a blood test called creatinine crosses fixed cut-off values. But in real ICU care, those rules can miss what we call “hidden acute kidney injury”: clinically consequential kidney injury that may not be flagged by fixed creatinine thresholds at the time of assessment because of baseline uncertainty, dilutional effects, or trajectory heterogeneity. In this study, we asked whether a computer model could uncover these hidden cases by watching how kidney tests change over time, rather than checking a single number. Using two large ICU databases, we fed the model short daily series of creatinine and an estimate of how well the kidneys filter blood. The model learned what typical trajectories look like and then gave each series an “anomaly” score that reflects how unusual it is. We found that higher anomaly scores were linked to a greater chance of starting dialysis or dying within the next few days, even when standard criteria were not met at the same assessment time point. Our results suggest that this trajectory-based signal could complement current definitions and help clinicians recognize hidden acute kidney injury.

Suggested Citation

  • Yoonjin Kang & Soojeong Yun & Seung Min Song & Ji Eun Kim & Hyo Jin Kim & Eun Jung Cho & Shin Young Ahn & Young Joo Kwon & Min Woo Kang, 2026. "Deep-learning time-series anomaly detection of acute kidney injury from creatinine–eGFR trajectories in the ICU," PLOS Digital Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(5), pages 1-19, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pdig00:0001411
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0001411
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/digitalhealth/article?id=10.1371/journal.pdig.0001411
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/digitalhealth/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pdig.0001411&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pdig.0001411?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pdig00:0001411. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: digitalhealth (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/digitalhealth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.