IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pdig00/0001288.html

Interpretable machine learning for predicting delays in seeking abortion among reproductive-aged women in Ethiopia: A study using EDHS 2016 data

Author

Listed:
  • Meron Asmamaw Alemayehu
  • Almaw Genet Yeshiwas
  • Abebaw Molla Kebede
  • Habitamu Mekonen
  • Getaneh Atikilt Yemata
  • Amare Genetu Ejigu
  • Ahmed Fentaw Ahmed
  • Abathun Temesgen
  • Gashaw Melkie Bayeh
  • Chalachew Yenew
  • Rahel Mulatie Anteneh
  • Zeamanuel Anteneh Yigzaw
  • Fantu Mamo Aragaw
  • Getasew Yirdaw
  • Sintayehu Simie Tsega
  • Anley Shiferaw Enawgaw
  • Tilahun Degu Tsega
  • Zufan Alamrie Asmare
  • Berhanu Abebaw Mekonnen

Abstract

Delayed access to abortion care in Ethiopia poses significant public health risks, yet it has not been studied using advanced machine learning models with interpretable techniques. This study aims to identify its key predictors through Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) values. The study used data from the 2016 Ethiopian Demographic and Health Survey. Data preprocessing tasks such as feature engineering, lumping, filtering, and encoding were performed before model building. Eight machine learning models, including LightGBM, Support Vector Machine, Random Forest, and XGBoost, were employed to predict delays in seeking an abortion. SHAP analysis was used to interpret feature importance and understand individual variable contributions. The prevalence of delayed abortion seeking was 1109 (54.3%). The Random Forest model performed the best, with an accuracy of 91.8% (95% CI: 89.3, 93.8) and an AUC of 97.6, effectively predicting delays in abortion-seeking behavior. SHAP analysis revealed that age (women aged 40–49), regional factors (residing in the Somali and Amhara regions), and lack of media exposure were strong positive contributors to delays. In contrast, urban residence and living in Addis Ababa were associated with a lower likelihood of delay. Alcohol consumption also showed a positive association with delay. The study identifies key factors influencing delays in seeking abortion services in Ethiopia, highlighting the importance of targeted interventions, especially for older women and those in rural regions. These findings offer valuable insights for designing public health initiatives aimed at reducing unsafe abortion-related maternal morbidity and mortality.Author summary: Delays in seeking abortion care remain a major public health concern in Ethiopia, increasing the risk of complications and maternal death. Understanding why women delay seeking care is essential for designing effective interventions. In this study, we analyzed nationally representative data from Ethiopian women to identify the key factors associated with delayed abortion care. We applied advanced machine learning methods and used an interpretable approach to clearly explain how different factors influence delay. More than half of the women in our study experienced delays in seeking abortion services. We found that older age, living in certain regions such as Somali and Amhara, lack of media exposure, rural residence, and alcohol use were important factors associated with higher likelihood of delay. In contrast, living in urban areas, particularly in Addis Ababa, was linked to earlier care-seeking. By identifying the most influential predictors, our findings provide evidence that can help policymakers and public health professionals design targeted strategies to reduce delays and prevent complications related to unsafe abortion.

Suggested Citation

  • Meron Asmamaw Alemayehu & Almaw Genet Yeshiwas & Abebaw Molla Kebede & Habitamu Mekonen & Getaneh Atikilt Yemata & Amare Genetu Ejigu & Ahmed Fentaw Ahmed & Abathun Temesgen & Gashaw Melkie Bayeh & Ch, 2026. "Interpretable machine learning for predicting delays in seeking abortion among reproductive-aged women in Ethiopia: A study using EDHS 2016 data," PLOS Digital Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(3), pages 1-19, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pdig00:0001288
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0001288
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/digitalhealth/article?id=10.1371/journal.pdig.0001288
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/digitalhealth/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pdig.0001288&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pdig.0001288?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pdig00:0001288. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: digitalhealth (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/digitalhealth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.