Author
Listed:
- Sorawat Sangkaew
- Bethan Cracknell Daniels
- Damien K Ming
- Bernard Hernandez
- Pau Herrero
- Piyarat Suntarattiwong
- Siripen Kalayanarooj
- Anon Srikiatkhachorn
- Alan L Rothman
- Darunee Buddhari
- Nguyen Lam Vuong
- Phung Khanh Lam
- Minh Tuan Nguyen
- Bridget Wills
- Cameron Simmons
- Christl A Donnelly
- Sophie Yacoub
- Alison Holmes
- Ilaria Dorigatti
Abstract
Dengue severity prediction models are usually developed using hospitalized patient data, but triage and hospital admission are mainly evaluated in outpatient settings. This study developed models using clinical and laboratory data from patients in outpatient settings during the febrile phase. Data from two cohort studies in Vietnam and Thailand were used to develop and validate six models: logistic regression with warning signs, Lasso-selected logistic regression, random forest, extreme gradient boosted classification, support vector machine, and artificial neural network. Models predicted dengue shock syndrome (DSS) as the primary endpoint and moderate plasma leakage and/or DSS as the secondary endpoint. We assessed model performance, discrimination, and calibration, using sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, Brier score, AUROC, CITL, calibration slope, calibration plots, and decision curve analysis. The optimal model was the Lasso-selected logistic regression for predicting DSS and the combined endpoint of moderate plasma leakage and/or DSS (Brier score: 0.044 [95% CI 0.043, 0.044] and 0.104 [95% CI 0.104, 0.105]; AUROC: 0.789 [95% CI 0.787, 0.791] and 0.741 [95% CI 0.740, 0.742]). We identified hematocrit, platelet count, lymphocyte count, and aspartate aminotransferase as predictors for DSS, and abdominal pain or tenderness, vomiting, mucosal bleeding, white blood cell count, lymphocyte count, platelet count, aspartate aminotransferase, and serum albumin as predictors for the secondary endpoint. Logistic regression and machine learning models using clinical and laboratory data during the febrile phase can support early prediction of severe disease in outpatient settings. Integrating risk prediction models into a decision support system could improve triage and optimize healthcare and resource allocation in endemic and resource-limited areas.Author summary: Most dengue risk models are developed from hospitalized patient data, despite triage occurring in outpatient settings. Few studies have examined early outpatient predictors, and none have undergone external validation across countries. In this study, we developed and validated dengue risk prediction models using logistic regression and machine learning with outpatient data from Vietnam and Thailand. Our prior systematic review and expert consultation informed predictor selection. The models outperformed the WHO warning signs alone in predicting dengue shock syndrome and moderate plasma leakage, demonstrating better discrimination and calibration. Models incorporating four to eight routinely collected clinical parameters show promise for guiding early triage and improving care allocation, especially in resource-limited, dengue-endemic settings.
Suggested Citation
Sorawat Sangkaew & Bethan Cracknell Daniels & Damien K Ming & Bernard Hernandez & Pau Herrero & Piyarat Suntarattiwong & Siripen Kalayanarooj & Anon Srikiatkhachorn & Alan L Rothman & Darunee Buddhari, 2026.
"Early individualized risk prediction using clinical data for children during the febrile phase of dengue in outpatient settings in Vietnam and Thailand,"
PLOS Digital Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(2), pages 1-16, February.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pdig00:0001171
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0001171
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pdig00:0001171. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: digitalhealth (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/digitalhealth .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.