Author
Listed:
- Edwin S Wong
- Caitlin N Dorsey
- Tara C Beatty
- Jennifer F Bobb
- Kelsey Stefanik-Guizlo
- Dustin L Key
- Arvind Ramaprasan
- Abisola E Idu
- John C Fortney
- Jessica Mogk
- Lorella Palazzo
- Ryan M Caldeiro
- Deborah King
- Angela Garza McWethy
- Joseph E Glass
Abstract
Evidence-based digital therapeutics are a promising approach for the scale-up of substance use disorder (SUD) treatments. Despite demonstrated efficacy, utilization of digital therapeutics is low. Strategic implementation approaches have potential for increasing digital therapeutic use. Applicability to health systems depends, in part, on the economic costs. The objective of this study was to describe implementation and intervention costs of implementation strategies to increase uptake of an evidence-based digital treatment for SUD. We conducted an economic evaluation alongside a hybrid type III cluster-randomized trial within a large integrated health system. All clinics implemented a standard implementation (SI) strategy, and clinics were assigned using 2x2 factorial randomization to additionally receive practice facilitation (PF) and/or health coaching (HC). Implementation costs included the cost of time devoted to implementation activities and direct operating costs. Time devoted to implementation activities was ascertained through structured meeting logs and time use surveys. Operating costs were captured using project budget reports. Intervention costs included expenses for prescriptions and healthcare encounters related to the digital therapeutic, measured using electronic health record data. Univariate statistics were calculated for cost estimates with comparisons presented by trial arm, implementation activity, staff role and study month. Analyses were conducted from a health system perspective. Twenty-one primary care sites participated in the trial. Over the 50-month study period, the total cost of all implementation activities was $748,088. Implementation costs per clinic were highest in the SI + PF + HC arm ($48,029), followed by SI + HC ($36,544), SI + PF ($30,665) and SI alone ($24,774). Intervention costs were highest in the SI + PF + HC arm ($18,051), followed by SI + PF ($11,492), SI + HC ($967) and SI alone ($1,879). Findings from this study can guide health systems by informing the economic investment required to employ implementation strategies demonstrated to increase uptake of evidence-based practices for behavioral health conditions.Trial Registration: NCT05160233.Author summary: Digital therapeutics are an efficacious approach to treating substance use disorder, however, uptake is low. Strategic implementation approaches to facilitate uptake of evidence-based practices have the potential for increasing use of digital therapeutics. Of the limited number of studies examining economic aspects of implementation approaches, none have quantified costs of implementing practices for substance use disorder. To our knowledge, this is the first study to quantify the costs of implementing an evidence-based practice for substance use disorder in a real-world setting. Findings from this study can inform decisions to adopt evidence-based approaches for substance use disorder into routine clinical workflows.
Suggested Citation
Edwin S Wong & Caitlin N Dorsey & Tara C Beatty & Jennifer F Bobb & Kelsey Stefanik-Guizlo & Dustin L Key & Arvind Ramaprasan & Abisola E Idu & John C Fortney & Jessica Mogk & Lorella Palazzo & Ryan M, 2026.
"Economic cost of strategic implementation approaches to increase uptake of digital therapeutics for substance use disorders in a large integrated health system,"
PLOS Digital Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(1), pages 1-16, January.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pdig00:0001145
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0001145
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pdig00:0001145. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: digitalhealth (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/digitalhealth .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.