IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pdig00/0001026.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Eliminating the AI digital divide by building local capacity

Author

Listed:
  • Freya Gulamali
  • Jee Young Kim
  • Kartik Pejavara
  • Ciera Thomas
  • Varoon Mathur
  • Zev Eigen
  • Mark Lifson
  • Manesh Patel
  • Keo Shaw
  • Danny Tobey
  • Alexandra Valladares
  • David Vidal
  • Jared Augenstein
  • Ashley Beecy
  • Sofi Bergkvist
  • Michael Burns
  • Michael Draugelis
  • Jesse M Ehrenfeld
  • Patricia Henwood
  • Tonya Jagneaux
  • Morgan Jeffries
  • Christopher Khuory
  • Frank J Liao
  • Vincent X Liu
  • Chris Longhurst
  • Dominic Mack
  • Thomas M Maddox
  • David McSwain
  • Steve Miff
  • Corey Miller
  • Sara G Murray
  • Brian W Patterson
  • Philip Payne
  • W Nicholson Price II
  • Ram Rimal
  • Michael J Sheppard
  • Karandeep Singh
  • Abdoul Sosseh
  • Jennifer Stoll
  • Corinne Stroum
  • Yasir Tarabichi
  • Sylvia Trujillo
  • Ladd Wiley
  • Alifia Hasan
  • Joan S Kpodzro
  • Suresh Balu
  • Mark P Sendak

Abstract

Over the past few years, health delivery organizations (HDOs) have been adopting and integrating AI tools, including clinical tools for tasks like predicting risk of inpatient mortality and operational tools for clinical documentation, scheduling and revenue cycle management, to fulfill the quintuple aim. The expertise and resources to do so is often concentrated in academic medical centers, leaving patients and providers in lower-resource settings unable to fully realize the benefits of AI tools. There is a growing divide in HDO ability to conduct AI product lifecycle management, due to a gap in resources and capabilities (e.g., technical expertise, funding, data infrastructure) to do so. In previous technological shifts in the United States including electronic health record and telehealth adoption, there were similar disparities in rates of adoption between higher and lower-resource settings. The government responded to these disparities successfully by creating centers of excellence to provide technical assistance to HDOs in rural and underserved communities. Similarly, a hub-and-spoke network, connecting HDOs with technical, regulatory, and legal support services from vendors, law firms, other HDOs with more AI capabilities, etc. can enable all settings to be well equipped to adopt AI tools. Health AI Partnership (HAIP) is a multi-stakeholder collaborative seeking to promote the safe and effective use of AI in healthcare. HAIP has launched a pilot program implementing a hub-and-spoke network, but targeted public investment is needed to enable capacity building nationwide. As more HDOs are striving to utilize AI tools to improve care delivery, federal and state governments should support the development of hub-and-spoke networks to promote widespread, meaningful adoption of AI across diverse settings. This effort requires coordination among all entities in the health AI ecosystem to ensure these tools are implemented safely and effectively and that all HDOs realize the benefits of these tools.

Suggested Citation

  • Freya Gulamali & Jee Young Kim & Kartik Pejavara & Ciera Thomas & Varoon Mathur & Zev Eigen & Mark Lifson & Manesh Patel & Keo Shaw & Danny Tobey & Alexandra Valladares & David Vidal & Jared Augenstei, 2025. "Eliminating the AI digital divide by building local capacity," PLOS Digital Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(10), pages 1-13, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pdig00:0001026
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0001026
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/digitalhealth/article?id=10.1371/journal.pdig.0001026
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/digitalhealth/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pdig.0001026&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pdig.0001026?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pdig00:0001026. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: digitalhealth (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/digitalhealth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.