Author
Listed:
- Harry Hochheiser
- Jesse Klug
- Thomas Mathie
- Tom J Pollard
- Jesse D Raffa
- Stephanie L Ballard
- Evamarie A Conrad
- Smitha Edakalavan
- Allan Joseph
- Nader Alnomasy
- Sarah Nutman
- Veronika Hill
- Sumit Kapoor
- Eddie Pérez Claudio
- Olga V Kravchenko
- Ruoting Li
- Mehdi Nourelahi
- Jenny Diaz
- W Michael Taylor
- Sydney R Rooney
- Maeve Woeltje
- Leo Anthony Celi
- Christopher M Horvat
Abstract
Objective: To challenge clinicians and informaticians to learn about potential sources of bias in medical machine learning models through investigation of data and predictions from an open-source severity of illness score.Methods: Over a two-day period (total elapsed time approximately 28 hours), we conducted a datathon that challenged interdisciplinary teams to investigate potential sources of bias in the Global Open Source Severity of Illness Score. Teams were invited to develop hypotheses, to use tools of their choosing to identify potential sources of bias, and to provide a final report.Results: Five teams participated, three of which included both informaticians and clinicians. Most (4/5) used Python for analyses, the remaining team used R. Common analysis themes included relationship of the GOSSIS-1 prediction score with demographics and care related variables; relationships between demographics and outcomes; calibration and factors related to the context of care; and the impact of missingness. Representativeness of the population, differences in calibration and model performance among groups, and differences in performance across hospital settings were identified as possible sources of bias.Discussion: Datathons are a promising approach for challenging developers and users to explore questions relating to unrecognized biases in medical machine learning algorithms.Author summary: Members of economically or socially disadvantaged groups are at risk of being adversely impacted by biased medical machine learning models. To avoid these undesirable outcomes, developers and users must understand the challenges involved in identifying potential biases. We conducted a datathon aimed at challenging a diverse group of participants to explore an open-source patient severity model for potential biases. Five groups of clinicians and informaticians used tools of their choosing to evaluate possible sources of biases, applying a range of analytic techniques and exploring multiple features. By engaging diverse participants with hands-on data experience with meaningful data, datathons have the potential to raise awareness of potential biases and promote best practices in developing fair and equitable medical machine learning models.
Suggested Citation
Harry Hochheiser & Jesse Klug & Thomas Mathie & Tom J Pollard & Jesse D Raffa & Stephanie L Ballard & Evamarie A Conrad & Smitha Edakalavan & Allan Joseph & Nader Alnomasy & Sarah Nutman & Veronika Hi, 2025.
"Raising awareness of potential biases in medical machine learning: Experience from a Datathon,"
PLOS Digital Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(7), pages 1-10, July.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pdig00:0000932
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000932
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pdig00:0000932. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: digitalhealth (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/digitalhealth .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.