IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pdig00/0000916.html

Using big data to search for possible geographic clustering of Congenital Heart Disease (CHD) across Australia

Author

Listed:
  • Calum Nicholson
  • Geoff Strange
  • David S Celermajer

Abstract

Several diseases show geographic clustering, giving insights into possible genetic and environmental causes. The pathogenesis of Congenital Heart Disease (CHD) remains largely unknown and analysis of geographic distribution of CHD cases lacks input from large, national-scale datasets. People with structural CHD were selected from the Australia and New Zealand CHD Registry. Of people known to be still living, from linkage with the National Death Index, addresses were geocoded and aggregated to standardised geographic regions with measures of the Australian population. Areas were described based on measures of their remoteness and driving time to hospitals. The relationship between the distribution of the CHD and Australian populations was compared with bivariate spatial correlation. Of 81,349 people with structural CHD in the Registry, 63,863 were still living and could be geocoded. Overall, most people lived in Major Cities, and within 1-hour drive from a hospital, with the proportion the same across the CHD population, the “complex CHD” population and the Australian population. Across the country, there was a strong positive correlation between the Australian population and the CHD population. There were only a small number of areas (6%) where the Australian and the CHD populations were proportionally different. Overall, there was clear evidence that the geographic distribution of the CHD population proportionally follows the general Australian population. This suggests that there is unlikely to be any spatial clusters that are driven by genetic or environmental causes.Author summary: Outcomes for people living with congenital heart disease have improved greatly over recent decades. As surgical intervention has improved, people with congenital heart disease are living longer and a greater proportion are now adults. This is success brings new challenges surrounding their healthcare. What kinds of complications will older people with congenital heart disease face, how will our health services cope with the increasing demands, and how should we deploy health services? We aimed to answer some of these question by assessing where people with congenital heart disease lived in Australia, and how that distribution compares with the general Australian population. This research is made possible by the Australia and New Zealand Congenital Heart Disease Registry, which enables this analysis to be conducted at a national scale for the first time. Most of the congenital heart disease population was living in major cities, and within a 1-hour drive of a hospital. Overall, their geographic distribution was very similar to that of the Australia population. These results suggest that there are not any environmental factors that are causing congenital heart disease, or that people with congenital heart disease are choosing to live in different places, compared to the general Australian population.

Suggested Citation

  • Calum Nicholson & Geoff Strange & David S Celermajer, 2026. "Using big data to search for possible geographic clustering of Congenital Heart Disease (CHD) across Australia," PLOS Digital Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(2), pages 1-11, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pdig00:0000916
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000916
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/digitalhealth/article?id=10.1371/journal.pdig.0000916
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/digitalhealth/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pdig.0000916&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pdig.0000916?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pdig00:0000916. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: digitalhealth (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/digitalhealth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.