Author
Listed:
- Sandra Jumbe
- Aysha Groen
- Lisa Ballard
- Alexander Torbuck
- Deniz Naghibi
- Sophie Leijdesdorff
- Jose G Perez-Ramos
- David Lim
- Virender Sorout
- Dingaane Msowoya
- Winnie W S Mak
- Rodrigo Ramalho
- Bessie Malila
Abstract
The increasing mental health gap in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) represents a significant global public health concern. Access to mental healthcare remains challenging due to stigma, lacking quality treatment options, and skilled workforce shortages. Tele-mental health, which involves remote access to care through information and communications technologies (ICTs) and mobile communication systems, may represent a promising solution. However, most research in this area has been conducted in high-income countries. This scoping review aimed to explore known barriers and facilitators to implementing tele-mental health solutions to populations in remote, rural, and underserved communities in LMICs to inform evidence-based development and implementation of digital interventions and strategies that can improve access to quality and affordable mental healthcare. Studies published between 2010 and 2024 were identified through comprehensive searches across four databases, namely PubMed, PsycINFO, Web of Science, and SpringerLink. Nine studies were included for analysis. Barriers and facilitators were categorised using the Capability, Opportunity, and Motivation = Behaviour (COM-B) model. A narrative synthesis revealed several barriers for patients, primarily related to limited physical and social opportunities, such as lack of mobile devices, unstable or limited internet access, and lack of private space at home. Barriers for mental health providers were predominantly linked to psychological capability, including insufficient knowledge concerning tele-mental health interventions. Time and cost efficiencies were key facilitators for both service users and mental health service providers, which enhanced access to care. Infrastructure development, educational initiatives, and training for providers are essential to create a more equitable tele-mental healthcare system.Author summary: Mental health conditions affect people worldwide, yet those living in rural, remote, and disadvantaged communities in lower-income countries often have the least access to care. Delivering mental healthcare remotely using technology such as phone calls, video calls, and text messaging offers a promising way to bridge this gap. However, we know surprisingly little about what makes these digital approaches work, or what gets in the way, for the communities who need them most. We reviewed published studies to map out the key barriers and challenges, as well as the things that help when delivering remote mental health services to underserved communities in lower-income countries. We found only nine studies that met our criteria, which itself signals how little research has been done in this area. Our findings show that practical obstacles such as unreliable internet, lack of personal devices, and absence of private space at home are the most common barriers for people seeking care. For providers, limited knowledge and training around digital tools were key challenges. On the positive side, both patients and providers valued the time and cost savings that remote care offers. These findings can help guide investment in infrastructure, training, and policy to make remote mental healthcare more equitable and accessible.
Suggested Citation
Sandra Jumbe & Aysha Groen & Lisa Ballard & Alexander Torbuck & Deniz Naghibi & Sophie Leijdesdorff & Jose G Perez-Ramos & David Lim & Virender Sorout & Dingaane Msowoya & Winnie W S Mak & Rodrigo Ram, 2026.
"A scoping review of barriers and facilitators to implementing tele-mental health solutions for rural, remote and underserved populations in low- and middle-income countries,"
PLOS Digital Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(6), pages 1-23, June.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pdig00:0000903
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000903
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pdig00:0000903. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: digitalhealth (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/digitalhealth .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.