IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pdig00/0000889.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Machine learning-based hybrid risk estimation system (ERES) in cardiac surgery: Supplementary insights from the ASA score analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Ayşe Banu Birlik
  • Hakan Tozan
  • Kevser Banu Köse

Abstract

Accurate prediction of postoperative mortality risk after cardiac surgery is essential to improve patient outcomes. Traditional models, such as EuroSCORE I, often struggle to capture the complex interactions among clinical variables, leading to suboptimal performance in specific populations. In this study, we developed and validated the Ensemble-Based Risk Estimation System (ERES), a machine learning model designed to enhance mortality prediction in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting and/or valve surgery. A retrospective analysis of 543 patients was performed using six machine learning algorithms applied to preoperative clinical data to assess predictive accuracy and clinical outcomes. Feature selection techniques, including Gini importance, Recursive Feature Elimination, and Adaptive Synthetic Sampling, were employed to improve accuracy and address class imbalance. ERES, which utilizes 15 key features, demonstrated superior predictive performance compared to EuroSCORE I. Calibration plots indicated more accurate probability estimates, whereas SHAP analysis identified creatinine, age, and left ventricular ejection fraction as the most significant predictors. The decision curve analysis further confirmed the superior clinical utility of ERES across a range of decision thresholds. Additionally, although the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA PS) score had limited predictive power independently, its combination with EuroSCORE I enhanced the predictive performance. Integrating machine learning models like ERES into clinical practice can improve decision making and patient outcomes although external validation is warranted for broader implementation.Author summary: Accurately predicting mortality risk in patients undergoing cardiac surgery is critical for improving clinical outcomes and guiding preoperative decision-making. Traditional scoring systems such as EuroSCORE I, while widely used, often fall short in capturing the complex, non-linear relationships among patient variables. In this study, we developed the Ensemble-Based Risk Estimation System (ERES), a machine learning-based model that leverages preoperative clinical and laboratory data to more precisely estimate short-term mortality risk after coronary artery bypass and/or valve surgery. Using advanced techniques such as feature selection, data balancing, and model calibration, ERES outperformed both traditional models and other machine learning algorithms across multiple performance metrics. The model identified creatinine, age, and ejection fraction as key predictors of postoperative outcomes. Additionally, although the ASA score alone showed limited predictive ability, its integration with EuroSCORE I improved the overall model performance. Our findings suggest that machine learning models like ERES offer a more personalized and accurate approach to risk stratification, especially in complex or high-risk cases. We strongly believe that supporting studies like this will contribute to the development of more effective health policies and evidence-based clinical practices.

Suggested Citation

  • Ayşe Banu Birlik & Hakan Tozan & Kevser Banu Köse, 2025. "Machine learning-based hybrid risk estimation system (ERES) in cardiac surgery: Supplementary insights from the ASA score analysis," PLOS Digital Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(6), pages 1-21, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pdig00:0000889
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000889
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/digitalhealth/article?id=10.1371/journal.pdig.0000889
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/digitalhealth/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pdig.0000889&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pdig.0000889?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pdig00:0000889. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: digitalhealth (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/digitalhealth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.