IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pdig00/0000783.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Detecting papilloedema as a marker of raised intracranial pressure using artificial intelligence: A systematic review

Author

Listed:
  • Lekaashree Rambabu
  • Thomas Edmiston
  • Brandon G Smith
  • Katharina Kohler
  • Angelos G Kolias
  • Richard A I Bethlehem
  • Pearse A Keane
  • Hani J Marcus
  • EyeVu Consortium
  • Peter J Hutchinson
  • Tom Bashford

Abstract

Automated detection of papilloedema using artificial intelligence (AI) and retinal images acquired through an ophthalmoscope for triage of patients with potential intracranial pathology could prove to be beneficial, particularly in resource-limited settings where access to neuroimaging may be limited. However, a comprehensive overview of the current literature on this field is lacking. We conducted a systematic review on the use of AI for papilloedema detection by searching four databases: Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and IEEE Xplore. Included studies were assessed for quality of reporting using the Checklist for AI in Medical Imaging and appraised using a novel 5-domain rubric, ‘SMART’, for the presence of bias. For a subset of studies, we also assessed the diagnostic test accuracy using the ‘Metadta’ command on Stata. Nineteen deep learning systems and eight non-deep learning systems were included. The median number of images of normal optic discs used in the training set was 2509 (IQR 580–9156) and in the testing set was 569 (IQR 119–1378). The number of papilloedema images in the training and testing sets was lower with a median of 1292 (IQR 201–2882) in training set and 201 (IQR 57–388) in the testing set. Age and gender were the two most frequently reported demographic data, included by one-third of the studies. Only ten studies performed external validation. The pooled sensitivity and specificity were calculated to be 0.87 [95% CI 0.76-0.93] and 0.90 [95% CI 0.74-0.97], respectively. Though AI model performance values are reported to be high, these results need to be interpreted with caution due highly biased data selection, poor quality of reporting, and limited evidence of reproducibility. Deep learning models show promise in retinal image analysis of papilloedema, however, external validation using large, diverse datasets in a variety of clinical settings is required before it can be considered a tool for triage of intracranial pathologies in resource-limited areas.Author summary: Papilloedema is a condition characterised by the swelling of the optic disc in the eye. It can be caused by increased intracranial pressure. It can be caused by an increase in pressure within the cranial cavity, which may be due to traumatic brain injuries, tumours, or infections. In low-resource settings where access to specialist imaging is limited, identifying papilloedema with accuracy by the bedside using retinal images and artificial intelligence could potentially serve as a tool for triaging when raised intracranial pressure is suspected and urgent surgical or medical intervention may be required. Our systematic review has critically appraised the primary studies which use any form of artificial intelligence to detect papilloedema from images of the retina. We provide a comprehensive overview and an in-depth discussion on the quality of reporting, areas of bias in model design, common limitations, and key findings from the primary literature.

Suggested Citation

  • Lekaashree Rambabu & Thomas Edmiston & Brandon G Smith & Katharina Kohler & Angelos G Kolias & Richard A I Bethlehem & Pearse A Keane & Hani J Marcus & EyeVu Consortium & Peter J Hutchinson & Tom Bash, 2025. "Detecting papilloedema as a marker of raised intracranial pressure using artificial intelligence: A systematic review," PLOS Digital Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(9), pages 1-23, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pdig00:0000783
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000783
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/digitalhealth/article?id=10.1371/journal.pdig.0000783
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/digitalhealth/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pdig.0000783&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pdig.0000783?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pdig00:0000783. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: digitalhealth (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/digitalhealth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.