Author
Listed:
- Shelby L Sturrock
- Rahim Moineddin
- Dionne Gesink
- Sarah Woodruff
- Daniel Fuller
Abstract
The objective of this study was to estimate the impact of software and hardware version on Apple Watch activity measurement using data from the COVFIT retrospective cohort study. We estimated the impact of software and hardware versions on activity measurement by comparing daily active calories and daily exercise minutes in the 7 days before and 7 days after upgrading from watchOS 5 to 6, 6 to 7, 7 to 8, 8 to 9 or between two hardware versions. For each transition, we fit mixed effect negative binomial regression models to estimate the effect of the upgrade on daily (a) exercise minutes and (b) active calories, overall and stratified by sex, with and without adjusting for weekday. We also calculated and plotted the mean person-level change in average activity levels between the two weeks. As a control, we repeated the entire analysis comparing activity data two weeks before vs. one week before each upgrade. 253 participants contributed data about at least one transition (software = 250, hardware = 74). Hardware upgrades were not associated with either outcome; however, some software upgrades were. Upgrading from watchOS 7 to 8 was associated with a large, statistically significant increase in daily exercise minutes (unadjusted rate ratio (RR) = 1.13, 95% CI: 1.06, 1.20). WatchOS 6 to 7 and 8 to 9 transitions were associated with statistically significant decreases in daily exercise minutes (6 to 7: unadjusted RR = 0.92, 95% CI: 0.86, 0.99; 8 to 9: unadjusted RR = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.86, 0.96) and active calories (6 to 7: RR = 0.96, 95% CI: 0.94, 0.99); 8 to 9: RR = 0.97, 95% CI: 0.94, 0.99). There was no significant change in either outcome during in the two-week control period for most transitions. Differences in software version over time or between people may confound physical activity analyses using Apple Watch data.Author summary: Researchers are increasingly using data from participant’s personal wearable devices, like Apple Watch, to study physical activity over time and between people. These people may all be using different hardware and/or software versions, which may impact how physical activity is measured. If this is the case, comparisons of physical activity levels over time, or between people, may represent the combined effects of differences in behaviour, as well as differences in how that behaviour is being measured. Using data collected for the COVFIT study, we compared daily active calories and daily exercise minutes in the week before and the week after our participants upgraded between two major software versions (e.g., watchOS 5 to watchOS 6), or switched to a different hardware version. We found large changes in daily exercise minutes and active calories in the week after compared to the week before some, but not all, major software upgrades. In future, researchers should measure and account for hardware and software version when either may differ between participants and/or over time.
Suggested Citation
Shelby L Sturrock & Rahim Moineddin & Dionne Gesink & Sarah Woodruff & Daniel Fuller, 2025.
"The effect of software and hardware version on Apple Watch activity measurement: A secondary analysis of the COVFIT retrospective cohort study,"
PLOS Digital Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(4), pages 1-14, April.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pdig00:0000727
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000727
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pdig00:0000727. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: digitalhealth (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/digitalhealth .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.