IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pdig00/0000618.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Unmasking biases and navigating pitfalls in the ophthalmic artificial intelligence lifecycle: A narrative review

Author

Listed:
  • Luis Filipe Nakayama
  • João Matos
  • Justin Quion
  • Frederico Novaes
  • William Greig Mitchell
  • Rogers Mwavu
  • Claudia Ju-Yi Ji Hung
  • Alvina Pauline Dy Santiago
  • Warachaya Phanphruk
  • Jaime S Cardoso
  • Leo Anthony Celi

Abstract

Over the past 2 decades, exponential growth in data availability, computational power, and newly available modeling techniques has led to an expansion in interest, investment, and research in Artificial Intelligence (AI) applications. Ophthalmology is one of many fields that seek to benefit from AI given the advent of telemedicine screening programs and the use of ancillary imaging. However, before AI can be widely deployed, further work must be done to avoid the pitfalls within the AI lifecycle. This review article breaks down the AI lifecycle into seven steps—data collection; defining the model task; data preprocessing and labeling; model development; model evaluation and validation; deployment; and finally, post-deployment evaluation, monitoring, and system recalibration—and delves into the risks for harm at each step and strategies for mitigating them.Author summary: In recent years, the surge in data availability, computational power, and AI techniques has sparked interest in using AI in fields like ophthalmology. However, before widespread AI deployment can happen, we must carefully navigate its lifecycle, comprising 7 key steps: data collection, task definition, data preparation, model development, evaluation, deployment, and post-deployment monitoring. This review article stands out by identifying potential pitfalls at each stage and offering actionable strategies to address them. Our article serves as a guide for harnessing AI effectively and safely in ophthalmology and related fields.

Suggested Citation

  • Luis Filipe Nakayama & João Matos & Justin Quion & Frederico Novaes & William Greig Mitchell & Rogers Mwavu & Claudia Ju-Yi Ji Hung & Alvina Pauline Dy Santiago & Warachaya Phanphruk & Jaime S Cardoso, 2024. "Unmasking biases and navigating pitfalls in the ophthalmic artificial intelligence lifecycle: A narrative review," PLOS Digital Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 3(10), pages 1-14, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pdig00:0000618
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000618
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/digitalhealth/article?id=10.1371/journal.pdig.0000618
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/digitalhealth/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pdig.0000618&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pdig.0000618?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pdig00:0000618. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: digitalhealth (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/digitalhealth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.