IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pdig00/0000617.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Design and implementation of digital literacy training programme: Findings of a quasi- experimental study from rural India

Author

Listed:
  • Aparajita Gogoi
  • Mercy Manoranjini
  • Mamta Gupta

Abstract

In India, digital divide is evident among rural sections of the society among women. For bridging this gap, the physical access to information and communications technology (ICT) along with training to harness these skills is important. This would empower the girls to gain more control over their health, finances, and safety, and can more freely assert their voice and agency. The project aimed to measure the knowledge and skills about the digital tools and its impact in different spheres of life (status of schooling, uptake of government schemes and mobility) for the adolescent girls before and after the implementation of the digital literacy training programme (DLTP) in rural India. The project was implemented in eight blocks of District Gumla of Jharkhand for three years from 2017-2020. The evaluations were conducted in three terms that is, baseline, midline and endline by using quasi-experimental research design. A quantitative questionnaire was developed to collect data from school dropout girls of 10–19 years. The sample coverage for intervention and comparison arm was 314 and 272 at the baseline, 318 and 260 at the midline, and 402 vs 202 in the endline. A state-of-the-art training curriculum was designed covering various components of digital literacy (hardware, software, applications, internet, emailing, social media, cyber security, education and career opportunities in the digital space). A team of facilitators were provided a laptop and a pico projector to conduct trainings in the intervention blocks. Majority of the participants were unmarried, lived along their parents and had ever attended school in both intervention and comparison arm. There was no significant difference in the proportion of girls having digital literacy score above median between intervention and comparison arm at the baseline. At the midline, the proportion of these girls with above median score was significantly higher in the intervention arm [n=203, 63.8%] as compared to the comparison arm [n=107, 41.2%]. Similarly, at the endline, the proportion of girls with higher median score for digital literacy increased significantly in the intervention arm [n=362, 90%] as compared to comparison arm [n=84, 41.6%]. The proportion of girls continuing education, physical access to ICT devices at home, exposure to mass media and perceived physical security increased in the intervention arm at the midline and endline as compared to comparison arm in the baseline. A significantly higher proportion of girls had knowledge about government schemes in the intervention arm as compared to comparison arm at the endline (p

Suggested Citation

  • Aparajita Gogoi & Mercy Manoranjini & Mamta Gupta, 2025. "Design and implementation of digital literacy training programme: Findings of a quasi- experimental study from rural India," PLOS Digital Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(4), pages 1-16, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pdig00:0000617
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000617
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/digitalhealth/article?id=10.1371/journal.pdig.0000617
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/digitalhealth/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pdig.0000617&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pdig.0000617?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pdig00:0000617. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: digitalhealth (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/digitalhealth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.