IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pdig00/0000549.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Personalizing the empiric treatment of gonorrhea using machine learning models

Author

Listed:
  • Rachel E Murray-Watson
  • Yonatan H Grad
  • Sancta B St. Cyr
  • Reza Yaesoubi

Abstract

Despite the emergence of antimicrobial-resistant (AMR) strains of Neisseria gonorrhoeae, the treatment of gonorrhea remains empiric and according to standardized guidelines, which are informed by the national prevalence of resistant strains. Yet, the prevalence of AMR varies substantially across geographic and demographic groups. We investigated whether data from the national surveillance system of AMR gonorrhea in the US could be used to personalize the empiric treatment of gonorrhea. We used data from the Gonococcal Isolate Surveillance Project collected between 2000–2010 to train and validate machine learning models to identify resistance to ciprofloxacin (CIP), one of the recommended first-line antibiotics until 2007. We used these models to personalize empiric treatments based on sexual behavior and geographic location and compared their performance with standardized guidelines, which recommended treatment with CIP, ceftriaxone (CRO), or cefixime (CFX) between 2005–2006, and either CRO or CFX between 2007–2010. Compared with standardized guidelines, the personalized treatments could have replaced 33% of CRO and CFX use with CIP while ensuring that 98% of patients were prescribed effective treatment during 2005–2010. The models maintained their performance over time and across geographic regions. Predictive models trained on data from national surveillance systems of AMR gonorrhea could be used to personalize the empiric treatment of gonorrhea based on patients’ basic characteristics at the point of care. This approach could reduce the unnecessary use of newer antibiotics while maintaining the effectiveness of first-line therapy.Author summary: Treating gonorrhea is complicated by the spread of drug-resistant strains, yet current approaches rely on empiric guidelines. Our study explored using national data on resistance in gonorrhea to personalize treatment decisions. From 2000 to 2010, we analyzed information from the Gonococcal Isolate Surveillance Project to develop predictive models. These models considered factors like where patients live and their behavior to suggest treatments tailored to their likely resistance profile. Compared to standard guidelines during that period, our personalized approach could have reduced unnecessary use of certain antibiotics by 33%, while still effectively treating 98% of patients. These findings highlight the potential of using data-driven models to improve how we treat gonorrhea, ensuring effective care while safeguarding newer antibiotics for the future.

Suggested Citation

  • Rachel E Murray-Watson & Yonatan H Grad & Sancta B St. Cyr & Reza Yaesoubi, 2024. "Personalizing the empiric treatment of gonorrhea using machine learning models," PLOS Digital Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 3(8), pages 1-14, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pdig00:0000549
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000549
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/digitalhealth/article?id=10.1371/journal.pdig.0000549
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/digitalhealth/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pdig.0000549&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pdig.0000549?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pdig00:0000549. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: digitalhealth (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/digitalhealth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.