Author
Listed:
- Matthew A Reyna
- Yashar Kiarashi
- Andoni Elola
- Jorge Oliveira
- Francesco Renna
- Annie Gu
- Erick A Perez Alday
- Nadi Sadr
- Ashish Sharma
- Jacques Kpodonu
- Sandra Mattos
- Miguel T Coimbra
- Reza Sameni
- Ali Bahrami Rad
- Gari D Clifford
Abstract
Cardiac auscultation is an accessible diagnostic screening tool that can help to identify patients with heart murmurs, who may need follow-up diagnostic screening and treatment for abnormal cardiac function. However, experts are needed to interpret the heart sounds, limiting the accessibility of cardiac auscultation in resource-constrained environments. Therefore, the George B. Moody PhysioNet Challenge 2022 invited teams to develop algorithmic approaches for detecting heart murmurs and abnormal cardiac function from phonocardiogram (PCG) recordings of heart sounds. For the Challenge, we sourced 5272 PCG recordings from 1452 primarily pediatric patients in rural Brazil, and we invited teams to implement diagnostic screening algorithms for detecting heart murmurs and abnormal cardiac function from the recordings. We required the participants to submit the complete training and inference code for their algorithms, improving the transparency, reproducibility, and utility of their work. We also devised an evaluation metric that considered the costs of screening, diagnosis, misdiagnosis, and treatment, allowing us to investigate the benefits of algorithmic diagnostic screening and facilitate the development of more clinically relevant algorithms. We received 779 algorithms from 87 teams during the Challenge, resulting in 53 working codebases for detecting heart murmurs and abnormal cardiac function from PCG recordings. These algorithms represent a diversity of approaches from both academia and industry, including methods that use more traditional machine learning techniques with engineered clinical and statistical features as well as methods that rely primarily on deep learning models to discover informative features. The use of heart sound recordings for identifying heart murmurs and abnormal cardiac function allowed us to explore the potential of algorithmic approaches for providing more accessible diagnostic screening in resource-constrained environments. The submission of working, open-source algorithms and the use of novel evaluation metrics supported the reproducibility, generalizability, and clinical relevance of the research from the Challenge.Author summary: Cardiac auscultation is an accessible diagnostic screening tool for identifying heart murmurs. However, experts are needed to interpret heart sounds, limiting the accessibility of auscultation. Therefore, the George B. Moody PhysioNet Challenge 2022 invited teams to develop algorithms for detecting heart murmurs and abnormal cardiac function from phonocardiogram (PCG) recordings of heart sounds. For the Challenge, we sourced 5272 PCG recordings from 1452 primarily pediatric patients in rural Brazil. We required the participants to submit the complete code for their algorithms, improving the transparency, reproducibility, and utility of their work. We also devised an evaluation metric that considered the costs of screening, diagnosis, misdiagnosis, and treatment, allowing us to investigate the benefits of algorithmic diagnostic screening and facilitate the development of more clinically relevant algorithms. We received 779 algorithms from 87 teams during the Challenge, resulting in 53 working codebases and publications that represent a diversity of algorithmic approaches to detecting heart murmurs and identifying clinical outcomes from heart sound recordings.
Suggested Citation
Matthew A Reyna & Yashar Kiarashi & Andoni Elola & Jorge Oliveira & Francesco Renna & Annie Gu & Erick A Perez Alday & Nadi Sadr & Ashish Sharma & Jacques Kpodonu & Sandra Mattos & Miguel T Coimbra & , 2023.
"Heart murmur detection from phonocardiogram recordings: The George B. Moody PhysioNet Challenge 2022,"
PLOS Digital Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 2(9), pages 1-22, September.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pdig00:0000324
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000324
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pdig00:0000324. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: digitalhealth (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/digitalhealth .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.