IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pdig00/0000282.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

EEG classification of traumatic brain injury and stroke from a nonspecific population using neural networks

Author

Listed:
  • Michael Caiola
  • Avaneesh Babu
  • Meijun Ye

Abstract

Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) and stroke are devastating neurological conditions that affect hundreds of people daily. Unfortunately, detecting TBI and stroke without specific imaging techniques or access to a hospital often proves difficult. Our prior research used machine learning on electroencephalograms (EEGs) to select important features and to classify between normal, TBI, and stroke on an independent dataset from a public repository with an accuracy of 0.71. In this study, we expanded to explore whether featureless and deep learning models can provide better performance in distinguishing between TBI, stroke and normal EEGs by including more comprehensive data extraction tools to drastically increase the size of the training dataset. We compared the performance of models built upon selected features with Linear Discriminative Analysis and ReliefF with several featureless deep learning models. We achieved 0.85 area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) using feature-based models, and 0.84 AUC with featureless models. In addition, we demonstrated that Gradient-weighted Class Activation Mapping (Grad-CAM) can provide insight into patient-specific EEG classification by highlighting problematic EEG segments during clinical review. Overall, our study suggests that machine learning and deep learning of EEG or its precomputed features can be a useful tool for TBI and stroke detection and classification. Although not surpassing the performance of feature-based models, featureless models reached similar levels without prior computation of a large feature set allowing for faster and cost-efficient deployment, analysis, and classification.Author summary: Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) and stroke are devastating neurological conditions that affect hundreds of people daily. Unfortunately, detecting TBI and stroke without specific imaging techniques or access to a hospital often proves difficult and may lead to long-term health problems. An automatic portable biomarker can potentially facilitate patients triage and ensure timely medical intervention. Using a public dataset of electroencephalograms (EEGs) collected on a large variety of subjects, we were able to identify those as TBI, stroke, or normal with the use of natural language processing. We trained machine learning models with a large set of features calculated from each group of EEGs to classify between the different groups on unseen EEGs. These models classified between normal, TBI, and stroke with excellent performance, however, they required prior calculation of the features. Therefore, we trained a variety of different types of deep learning models that could work on little to no features. Overall, we showed these feature-based and featureless models performed similarly, and thus, allow for faster and cost-efficient deployment, analysis, and classification.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael Caiola & Avaneesh Babu & Meijun Ye, 2023. "EEG classification of traumatic brain injury and stroke from a nonspecific population using neural networks," PLOS Digital Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 2(7), pages 1-22, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pdig00:0000282
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000282
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/digitalhealth/article?id=10.1371/journal.pdig.0000282
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/digitalhealth/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pdig.0000282&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pdig.0000282?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pdig00:0000282. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: digitalhealth (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/digitalhealth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.