Author
Listed:
- Karl W Schulz
- Kelly Gaither
- Corwin Zigler
- Tomislav Urban
- Justin Drake
- Radek Bukowski
Abstract
Child birth via Cesarean section accounts for approximately 32% of all births each year in the United States. A variety of risk factors and complications can lead caregivers and patients to plan for a Cesarean delivery in advance before onset of labor. However, a non-trivial subset of Cesarean sections (∼25%) are unplanned and occur after an initial trial of labor is attempted. Unfortunately, patients who deliver via unplanned Cesarean sections have increased maternal morbidity and mortality rates and higher rates of neonatal intensive care admissions. In an effort to develop models aimed at improving health outcomes in labor and delivery, this work seeks to explore the use of national vital statistics data to quantify the likelihood of an unplanned Cesarean section based on 22 maternal characteristics. Machine learning techniques are used to ascertain influential features, train and evaluate models, and assess accuracy against available test data. Based on cross-validation results from a large training cohort (n = 6,530,467 births), the gradient-boosted tree algorithm was identified as the best performer and was evaluated on a large test cohort (n = 10,613,877 births) for two prediction scenarios. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curves of 0.77 or higher and recall scores of 0.78 or higher were obtained and the resulting models are well calibrated. Combined with feature importance analysis to explain why certain maternal characteristics lead to a specific prediction in individual patients, the developed analysis pipeline provides additional quantitative information to aid in the decision process on whether to plan for a Cesarean section in advance, a substantially safer option among women at a high risk of unplanned Cesarean delivery during labor.Author summary: Child birth via Cesarean section accounts for almost one third of all births each year in the United States. While many of these Cesarean deliveries are planned for before the onset of labor, a subset arise from complications during labor and occur after an initial trial of labor. These unplanned Cesarean sections unfortunately have increased maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality rates. This work leverages vital statistics data to develop predictive models that quantify the risk of having an unplanned Cesarean section based on 22 maternal characteristics. Multiple derived models were benchmarked against a large testing cohort to identify a clinically practical model that also demonstrated high calibration accuracy. Ultimately, this model can be used to provide a quantitative aid in the decision process on whether to plan for a Cesarean section in advance, a substantially safer option among women at a high risk of encountering an unplanned Cesarean delivery during labor.
Suggested Citation
Karl W Schulz & Kelly Gaither & Corwin Zigler & Tomislav Urban & Justin Drake & Radek Bukowski, 2022.
"Optimal mode of delivery in pregnancy: Individualized predictions using national vital statistics data,"
PLOS Digital Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 1(12), pages 1-18, December.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pdig00:0000166
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000166
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pdig00:0000166. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: digitalhealth (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/digitalhealth .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.