Author
Listed:
- Yuanfang Ren
- Tyler J Loftus
- Yanjun Li
- Ziyuan Guan
- Matthew M Ruppert
- Shounak Datta
- Gilbert R Upchurch Jr.
- Patrick J Tighe
- Parisa Rashidi
- Benjamin Shickel
- Tezcan Ozrazgat-Baslanti
- Azra Bihorac
Abstract
During the early stages of hospital admission, clinicians use limited information to make decisions as patient acuity evolves. We hypothesized that clustering analysis of vital signs measured within six hours of hospital admission would reveal distinct patient phenotypes with unique pathophysiological signatures and clinical outcomes. We created a longitudinal electronic health record dataset for 75,762 adult patient admissions to a tertiary care center in 2014–2016 lasting six hours or longer. Physiotypes were derived via unsupervised machine learning in a training cohort of 41,502 patients applying consensus k-means clustering to six vital signs measured within six hours of admission. Reproducibility and correlation with clinical biomarkers and outcomes were assessed in validation cohort of 17,415 patients and testing cohort of 16,845 patients. Training, validation, and testing cohorts had similar age (54–55 years) and sex (55% female), distributions. There were four distinct clusters. Physiotype A had physiologic signals consistent with early vasoplegia, hypothermia, and low-grade inflammation and favorable short-and long-term clinical outcomes despite early, severe illness. Physiotype B exhibited early tachycardia, tachypnea, and hypoxemia followed by the highest incidence of prolonged respiratory insufficiency, sepsis, acute kidney injury, and short- and long-term mortality. Physiotype C had minimal early physiological derangement and favorable clinical outcomes. Physiotype D had the greatest prevalence of chronic cardiovascular and kidney disease, presented with severely elevated blood pressure, and had good short-term outcomes but suffered increased 3-year mortality. Comparing sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) scores across physiotypes demonstrated that clustering did not simply recapitulate previously established acuity assessments. In a heterogeneous cohort of hospitalized patients, unsupervised machine learning techniques applied to routine, early vital sign data identified physiotypes with unique disease categories and distinct clinical outcomes. This approach has the potential to augment understanding of pathophysiology by distilling thousands of disease states into a few physiological signatures.Author summary: In this paper, we present a machine learning approach, consensus clustering, to group hospitalized patients based on six routinely collected vital signs measured within six hours of hospital admission into previously undescribed subsets or acute illness phenotypes that may have different risks for a poor outcome or different treatment responses. We identified four acute illness phenotypes associated with distinct clinical characteristics, biomarker patterns, and clinical outcomes. We validated the reproducibility of phenotypes using different dataset and clustering approach. The early identified phenotypes, that have unique disease states and mortality risk, have the potential to augment understanding of pathophysiology by distilling thousands of disease states into a few physiological signatures and clinical decision-support systems under time constraints.
Suggested Citation
Yuanfang Ren & Tyler J Loftus & Yanjun Li & Ziyuan Guan & Matthew M Ruppert & Shounak Datta & Gilbert R Upchurch Jr. & Patrick J Tighe & Parisa Rashidi & Benjamin Shickel & Tezcan Ozrazgat-Baslanti & , 2022.
"Physiologic signatures within six hours of hospitalization identify acute illness phenotypes,"
PLOS Digital Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 1(10), pages 1-21, October.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pdig00:0000110
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000110
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pdig00:0000110. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: digitalhealth (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/digitalhealth .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.