IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pdig00/0000042.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A literature review on the analysis of symptom-based clinical pathways: Time for a different approach?

Author

Listed:
  • Nammunikankanange Janak Gunatilleke
  • Jacques Fleuriot
  • Atul Anand

Abstract

Breathlessness is a common clinical presentation, accounting for a quarter of all emergency hospital attendances. As a complex undifferentiated symptom, it may be caused by dysfunction in multiple body systems. Electronic health records are rich with activity data to inform clinical pathways from undifferentiated breathlessness to specific disease diagnoses. These data may be amenable to process mining, a computational technique that uses event logs to identify common patterns of activity. We reviewed use of process mining and related techniques to understand clinical pathways for patients with breathlessness. We searched the literature from two perspectives: studies of clinical pathways for breathlessness as a symptom, and those focussed on pathways for respiratory and cardiovascular diseases that are commonly associated with breathlessness. The primary search included PubMed, IEEE Xplore and ACM Digital Library. We included studies if breathlessness or a relevant disease was present in combination with a process mining concept. We excluded non-English publications, and those focussed on biomarkers, investigations, prognosis, or disease progression rather than symptoms. Eligible articles were screened before full-text review. Of 1,400 identified studies, 1,332 studies were excluded through screening and removal of duplicates. Following full-text review of 68 studies, 13 were included in qualitative synthesis, of which two (15%) were symptom and 11 (85%) disease focused. While studies reported highly varied methodologies, only one included true process mining, using multiple techniques to explore Emergency Department clinical pathways. Most included studies trained and internally validated within single-centre datasets, limiting evidence for wider generalisability. Our review has highlighted a lack of clinical pathway analyses for breathlessness as a symptom, compared to disease-focussed approaches. Process mining has potential application in this area, but has been under-utilised in part due to data interoperability challenges. There is an unmet research need for larger, prospective multicentre studies of patient pathways following presentation with undifferentiated breathlessness.Author summary: Breathlessness is a common symptom for patients attending hospital. This can be caused by many conditions and getting a diagnosis may be complex. The journey from attending hospital to a diagnosis is called a ‘clinical pathway’. Process mining is a way of understanding the order and timing of events within a clinical pathway. We have reviewed the evidence for using process mining to better understand the clinical pathways for patients with breathlessness. We found 13 relevant studies and of those, only two focussed on the symptom and the rest on related diseases such as Covid-19. Most studies were also of small-scale, and the results were generally not replicated in more than one hospital. Only one study used true process mining to look at symptoms in patients attending a single Emergency Department. We believe that considering symptoms and using process mining could help clinicians understand how different patients interact with healthcare. This may improve the effectiveness of clinical pathways in the future, such as by reducing delays in diagnosis. Process mining may also help explain differences in response to treatments between individuals and help guide clinicians on the best time to organise tests such as specialist scans.

Suggested Citation

  • Nammunikankanange Janak Gunatilleke & Jacques Fleuriot & Atul Anand, 2022. "A literature review on the analysis of symptom-based clinical pathways: Time for a different approach?," PLOS Digital Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 1(5), pages 1-12, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pdig00:0000042
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000042
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/digitalhealth/article?id=10.1371/journal.pdig.0000042
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/digitalhealth/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pdig.0000042&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pdig.0000042?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael Arias & Eric Rojas & Santiago Aguirre & Felipe Cornejo & Jorge Munoz-Gama & Marcos Sepúlveda & Daniel Capurro, 2020. "Mapping the Patient’s Journey in Healthcare through Process Mining," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-16, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pdig00:0000042. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: digitalhealth (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/digitalhealth .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.