Author
Listed:
- Edmond Li
- Rosy Tsopra
- Geronimo Jimenez
- Alice Serafini
- Gustavo Gusso
- Heidrun Lingner
- Maria Jose Fernandez
- Greg Irving
- Davorina Petek
- Robert Hoffman
- Vanja Lazic
- Ensieh Memarian
- Tuomas Koskela
- Claire Collins
- Sandra Milena Espitia
- Ana Clavería
- Katarzyna Nessler
- Braden Gregory O’Neill
- Kyle Hoedebecke
- Mehmet Ungan
- Liliana Laranjo
- Saira Ghafur
- Gianluca Fontana
- Azeem Majeed
- Josip Car
- Ara Darzi
- Ana Luisa Neves
Abstract
With the onset of COVID-19, general practitioners (GPs) and patients worldwide swiftly transitioned from face-to-face to digital remote consultations. There is a need to evaluate how this global shift has impacted patient care, healthcare providers, patient and carer experience, and health systems. We explored GPs’ perspectives on the main benefits and challenges of using digital virtual care. GPs across 20 countries completed an online questionnaire between June–September 2020. GPs’ perceptions of main barriers and challenges were explored using free-text questions. Thematic analysis was used to analyse the data. A total of 1,605 respondents participated in our survey. The benefits identified included reducing COVID-19 transmission risks, guaranteeing access and continuity of care, improved efficiency, faster access to care, improved convenience and communication with patients, greater work flexibility for providers, and hastening the digital transformation of primary care and accompanying legal frameworks. Main challenges included patients’ preference for face-to-face consultations, digital exclusion, lack of physical examinations, clinical uncertainty, delays in diagnosis and treatment, overuse and misuse of digital virtual care, and unsuitability for certain types of consultations. Other challenges include the lack of formal guidance, higher workloads, remuneration issues, organisational culture, technical difficulties, implementation and financial issues, and regulatory weaknesses. At the frontline of care delivery, GPs can provide important insights on what worked well, why, and how during the pandemic. Lessons learned can be used to inform the adoption of improved virtual care solutions and support the long-term development of platforms that are more technologically robust and secure.Author summary: Whether it be a simple telephone call or more sophisticated video conferencing systems, virtual care tools have been in use in primary care settings worldwide in one form or another throughout the past two decades. Over time, these tools have grown in availability, matured in their capabilities, but played a largely supportive role as an alternative option to traditional face-to-face consultations. This all changed in early 2020.
Suggested Citation
Edmond Li & Rosy Tsopra & Geronimo Jimenez & Alice Serafini & Gustavo Gusso & Heidrun Lingner & Maria Jose Fernandez & Greg Irving & Davorina Petek & Robert Hoffman & Vanja Lazic & Ensieh Memarian & T, 2022.
"General practitioners’ perceptions of using virtual primary care during the COVID-19 pandemic: An international cross-sectional survey study,"
PLOS Digital Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 1(5), pages 1-23, May.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pdig00:0000029
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000029
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pdig00:0000029. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: digitalhealth (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/digitalhealth .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.