IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pdig00/0000005.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Applied machine learning for the risk-stratification and clinical decision support of hospitalised patients with dengue in Vietnam

Author

Listed:
  • Damien K Ming
  • Bernard Hernandez
  • Sorawat Sangkaew
  • Nguyen Lam Vuong
  • Phung Khanh Lam
  • Nguyen Minh Nguyet
  • Dong Thi Hoai Tam
  • Dinh The Trung
  • Nguyen Thi Hanh Tien
  • Nguyen Minh Tuan
  • Nguyen Van Vinh Chau
  • Cao Thi Tam
  • Ho Quang Chanh
  • Huynh Trung Trieu
  • Cameron P Simmons
  • Bridget Wills
  • Pantelis Georgiou
  • Alison H Holmes
  • Sophie Yacoub
  • on behalf of the Vietnam ICU Translational Applications Laboratory (VITAL) investigators

Abstract

Background: Identifying patients at risk of dengue shock syndrome (DSS) is vital for effective healthcare delivery. This can be challenging in endemic settings because of high caseloads and limited resources. Machine learning models trained using clinical data could support decision-making in this context. Methods: We developed supervised machine learning prediction models using pooled data from adult and paediatric patients hospitalised with dengue. Individuals from 5 prospective clinical studies in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam conducted between 12th April 2001 and 30th January 2018 were included. The outcome was onset of dengue shock syndrome during hospitalisation. Data underwent random stratified splitting at 80:20 ratio with the former used only for model development. Ten-fold cross-validation was used for hyperparameter optimisation and confidence intervals derived from percentile bootstrapping. Optimised models were evaluated against the hold-out set. Findings: The final dataset included 4,131 patients (477 adults and 3,654 children). DSS was experienced by 222 (5.4%) of individuals. Predictors were age, sex, weight, day of illness at hospitalisation, indices of haematocrit and platelets over first 48 hours of admission and before the onset of DSS. An artificial neural network model (ANN) model had best performance with an area under receiver operator curve (AUROC) of 0.83 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.76–0.85) in predicting DSS. When evaluated against the independent hold-out set this calibrated model exhibited an AUROC of 0.82, specificity of 0.84, sensitivity of 0.66, positive predictive value of 0.18 and negative predictive value of 0.98. Interpretation: The study demonstrates additional insights can be obtained from basic healthcare data, when applied through a machine learning framework. The high negative predictive value could support interventions such as early discharge or ambulatory patient management in this population. Work is underway to incorporate these findings into an electronic clinical decision support system to guide individual patient management.

Suggested Citation

  • Damien K Ming & Bernard Hernandez & Sorawat Sangkaew & Nguyen Lam Vuong & Phung Khanh Lam & Nguyen Minh Nguyet & Dong Thi Hoai Tam & Dinh The Trung & Nguyen Thi Hanh Tien & Nguyen Minh Tuan & Nguyen V, 2022. "Applied machine learning for the risk-stratification and clinical decision support of hospitalised patients with dengue in Vietnam," PLOS Digital Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 1(1), pages 1-13, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pdig00:0000005
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/digitalhealth/article?id=10.1371/journal.pdig.0000005
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/digitalhealth/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pdig.0000005&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pdig.0000005?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pdig00:0000005. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: digitalhealth (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/digitalhealth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.