IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcsy00/0000080.html

A typology of rules for knowledge exchange in higher-order interactions

Author

Listed:
  • Anna Sisk
  • Matthew J Silk
  • Nakeya D Williams
  • Nina H Fefferman

Abstract

Social learning is important to humans and other animals as they gather information about their environment. Information and behaviours can therefore spread rapidly through social networks as contagions. However, the way individuals acquire and use social information is highly variable and frequently complex, often shaped by higher-order or multibody interactions that are not straightforwardly described by conventional dyadic networks. There has been considerable recent progress in modeling social contagions across higher-order networks that explicitly quantify these multibody interactions. A challenge for studying social contagion across multibody or higher-order interactions is the diversity of ways in which knowledge can be exchanged within or among groups. Here we provide a typology of knowledge exchange rules in higher-order networks, focusing on both learning and discovery. We also provide a non-exhaustive list of many basic knowledge exchange rules, to demonstrate our typology and its value in distinguishing between different mechanisms of social learning. Our aim is to provide a framework that helps researchers interested in modeling knowledge exchange in higher-order networks to develop new models and adapt existing models to questions of interest. By doing so we hope to promote interdisciplinarity in the study of how multibody interactions shape social contagions, especially at this critically incipient stage - avoiding the inevitable challenges from the eventual need to integrate parallel, independent, complementary advances among different disciplines.Author summary: Learning from each other is important to humans and other animals as it provides safe or quick ways to gather information about the world around you. Because of this ‘social learning’, ideas and behaviours can spread quickly through our social networks. Previously, researchers have mainly described these social networks using ‘dyadic’ approaches that only consider connections between pairs of individuals at a time. However, often social interactions occur between more than two individuals at a time, and this can influence how we learn from each other. Here we classify different ways that social learning occurs in groups and provide a list of and mathematical formulae for many potential rules for how knowledge is exchanged in these contexts. We aim to provide a framework for researchers interested in modeling how we learn from each other in groups, and help to integrate ideas from different areas of research into social learning. Doing so now is valuable as the number of studies using higher-order networks to study group behviour is growing fast.

Suggested Citation

  • Anna Sisk & Matthew J Silk & Nakeya D Williams & Nina H Fefferman, 2026. "A typology of rules for knowledge exchange in higher-order interactions," PLOS Complex Systems, Public Library of Science, vol. 3(1), pages 1-19, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcsy00:0000080
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcsy.0000080
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org//article?id=10.1371/journal.pcsy.0000080
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org//article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcsy.0000080&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcsy.0000080?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcsy00:0000080. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: complexsystem (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/complexsystems/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.